Evaluating batteries for renewable energy storage: A hybrid MCDM framework based on combined objective weights and uncertainty-preserved COPRAS

IF 1.9 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENERGY & FUELS
Yongxin Guan, Zhongfang Liu, Yunxi Du, Di Xu
{"title":"Evaluating batteries for renewable energy storage: A hybrid MCDM framework based on combined objective weights and uncertainty-preserved COPRAS","authors":"Yongxin Guan, Zhongfang Liu, Yunxi Du, Di Xu","doi":"10.1063/5.0153007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Battery technologies offer promising solutions for renewable energy storage. However, selecting the most suitable battery requires proper investigation. This study introduces a multi-criteria decision-making framework for assessing batteries based on various criteria and uncertain data, by using a combined objective weighting method and an uncertainty-preserved complex proportional assessment (UP-COPRAS). The proposed weighting method ensures objectivity and fairness in the weighting result by integrating interval entropy and a gray relational coefficient-supported decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory to capture variation and correlation degrees among the criteria. After incorporating interval numbers with a compensatory ranking method, the UP-COPRAS prioritizes batteries in a simple yet rigorous way using uncertain evaluation data. To test the feasibility of the framework, an illustrative case was employed to assess four battery alternatives using a five-dimensional criteria system. Through results comparison, two mathematical contributions are confirmed. First, the combined objective weighting method uses the variation and correlation features of numerical data to determine criteria weights, which prevents subjective manipulation and eliminates bias in statistical analysis. Second, the UP-COPRAS preserves uncertainties throughout the evaluation, resulting in a rational decision output by eliminating interference in the original data.","PeriodicalId":16953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0153007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Battery technologies offer promising solutions for renewable energy storage. However, selecting the most suitable battery requires proper investigation. This study introduces a multi-criteria decision-making framework for assessing batteries based on various criteria and uncertain data, by using a combined objective weighting method and an uncertainty-preserved complex proportional assessment (UP-COPRAS). The proposed weighting method ensures objectivity and fairness in the weighting result by integrating interval entropy and a gray relational coefficient-supported decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory to capture variation and correlation degrees among the criteria. After incorporating interval numbers with a compensatory ranking method, the UP-COPRAS prioritizes batteries in a simple yet rigorous way using uncertain evaluation data. To test the feasibility of the framework, an illustrative case was employed to assess four battery alternatives using a five-dimensional criteria system. Through results comparison, two mathematical contributions are confirmed. First, the combined objective weighting method uses the variation and correlation features of numerical data to determine criteria weights, which prevents subjective manipulation and eliminates bias in statistical analysis. Second, the UP-COPRAS preserves uncertainties throughout the evaluation, resulting in a rational decision output by eliminating interference in the original data.
评估可再生能源储能电池:基于目标权重和不确定性保留COPRAS的混合MCDM框架
电池技术为可再生能源存储提供了有前景的解决方案。然而,选择最合适的电池需要进行适当的调查。本研究引入了一个基于各种标准和不确定数据的多标准决策框架,通过使用组合目标加权方法和不确定性保留复比例评估(UP-COPRAS)来评估电池。所提出的加权方法通过集成区间熵和灰色关联系数支持决策试验和评估实验室来捕捉标准之间的变化和相关性,从而确保加权结果的客观性和公平性。在将区间数与补偿排序方法相结合后,UP-CORAS使用不确定的评估数据,以简单而严格的方式对电池进行优先级排序。为了测试该框架的可行性,采用了一个说明性案例,使用五维标准体系评估了四种电池替代品。通过结果比较,证实了两个数学贡献。首先,组合客观加权方法利用数值数据的变化和相关性特征来确定标准权重,防止了主观操纵,消除了统计分析中的偏差。其次,UP-CORAS在整个评估过程中保留了不确定性,通过消除原始数据中的干扰来产生合理的决策输出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.00%
发文量
122
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy (JRSE) is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal covering all areas of renewable and sustainable energy relevant to the physical science and engineering communities. The interdisciplinary approach of the publication ensures that the editors draw from researchers worldwide in a diverse range of fields. Topics covered include: Renewable energy economics and policy Renewable energy resource assessment Solar energy: photovoltaics, solar thermal energy, solar energy for fuels Wind energy: wind farms, rotors and blades, on- and offshore wind conditions, aerodynamics, fluid dynamics Bioenergy: biofuels, biomass conversion, artificial photosynthesis Distributed energy generation: rooftop PV, distributed fuel cells, distributed wind, micro-hydrogen power generation Power distribution & systems modeling: power electronics and controls, smart grid Energy efficient buildings: smart windows, PV, wind, power management Energy conversion: flexoelectric, piezoelectric, thermoelectric, other technologies Energy storage: batteries, supercapacitors, hydrogen storage, other fuels Fuel cells: proton exchange membrane cells, solid oxide cells, hybrid fuel cells, other Marine and hydroelectric energy: dams, tides, waves, other Transportation: alternative vehicle technologies, plug-in technologies, other Geothermal energy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信