Validation of turbulence intensity as simulated by the Weather Research and Forecasting model off the US northeast coast

IF 3.6 Q3 GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
S. Tai, L. Berg, R. Krishnamurthy, R. Newsom, A. Kirincich
{"title":"Validation of turbulence intensity as simulated by the Weather Research and Forecasting model off the US northeast coast","authors":"S. Tai, L. Berg, R. Krishnamurthy, R. Newsom, A. Kirincich","doi":"10.5194/wes-8-433-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Turbulence intensity (TI) is often used to quantify the strength of\nturbulence in wind energy applications and serves as the basis of standards\nin wind turbine design. Thus, accurately characterizing the spatiotemporal\nvariability in TI should lead to improved predictions of power production.\nNevertheless, turbulence measurements over the ocean are far less prevalent\nthan over land due to challenges in instrumental deployment, maintenance,\nand operation. Atmospheric models such as mesoscale (weather prediction) and large-eddy simulation (LES) models are commonly used in the wind energy industry to assess the spatial variability of a given site. However, the TI derivation from atmospheric models has not been well examined. An algorithm is proposed in this study to realize online calculation of TI in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. Simulated TI is divided into two components depending on scale, including sub-grid (parameterized based on turbulence kinetic energy (TKE)) and grid resolved. The sensitivity of sea surface temperature (SST) on simulated TI is also tested. An assessment is performed by using observations collected during a field campaign conducted from February to June 2020 near the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Martha's Vineyard Coastal Observatory. Results show that while simulated TKE is generally smaller than the lidar-observed value, wind speed bias is usually small. Overall, this leads to a slight underestimation in sub-grid-scale estimated TI. Improved SST representation subsequently reduces model biases in atmospheric stability as well as wind speed and sub-grid TI near the hub height. Large TI events in conjunction with mesoscale weather systems observed during the studied period pose a challenge to accurately estimating TI from models. Due to notable uncertainty in accurately simulating those events, this suggests summing up sub-grid and resolved TI may not be an ideal solution. Efforts in further improving skills in simulating mesoscale flow and cloud systems are necessary as the next steps.\n","PeriodicalId":46540,"journal":{"name":"Wind Energy Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wind Energy Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-433-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Turbulence intensity (TI) is often used to quantify the strength of turbulence in wind energy applications and serves as the basis of standards in wind turbine design. Thus, accurately characterizing the spatiotemporal variability in TI should lead to improved predictions of power production. Nevertheless, turbulence measurements over the ocean are far less prevalent than over land due to challenges in instrumental deployment, maintenance, and operation. Atmospheric models such as mesoscale (weather prediction) and large-eddy simulation (LES) models are commonly used in the wind energy industry to assess the spatial variability of a given site. However, the TI derivation from atmospheric models has not been well examined. An algorithm is proposed in this study to realize online calculation of TI in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. Simulated TI is divided into two components depending on scale, including sub-grid (parameterized based on turbulence kinetic energy (TKE)) and grid resolved. The sensitivity of sea surface temperature (SST) on simulated TI is also tested. An assessment is performed by using observations collected during a field campaign conducted from February to June 2020 near the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Martha's Vineyard Coastal Observatory. Results show that while simulated TKE is generally smaller than the lidar-observed value, wind speed bias is usually small. Overall, this leads to a slight underestimation in sub-grid-scale estimated TI. Improved SST representation subsequently reduces model biases in atmospheric stability as well as wind speed and sub-grid TI near the hub height. Large TI events in conjunction with mesoscale weather systems observed during the studied period pose a challenge to accurately estimating TI from models. Due to notable uncertainty in accurately simulating those events, this suggests summing up sub-grid and resolved TI may not be an ideal solution. Efforts in further improving skills in simulating mesoscale flow and cloud systems are necessary as the next steps.
美国东北海岸外天气研究与预报模式模拟的湍流强度的验证
摘要湍流强度(TI)通常用于量化风能应用中的湍流强度,并作为风力涡轮机设计标准的基础。因此,准确地描述TI的时空变化性应该可以改善对电力生产的预测。然而,由于仪器部署、维护和操作方面的挑战,海洋湍流测量远不如陆地湍流测量普遍。中尺度(天气预测)和大涡模拟(LES)等大气模型通常用于风能行业,以评估给定场地的空间变异性。然而,从大气模型推导出的TI并没有得到很好的检验。本文提出了一种在天气研究与预报(WRF)模型中实现TI在线计算的算法。模拟TI根据尺度分为两个部分,包括子网格(基于湍流动能(TKE)进行参数化)和网格解析。还测试了海面温度对模拟TI的敏感性。评估是利用2020年2月至6月在伍兹霍尔海洋研究所玛莎葡萄园海岸天文台附近进行的实地考察中收集的观测结果进行的。结果表明,虽然模拟的TKE通常小于激光雷达的观测值,但风速偏差通常较小。总的来说,这导致了对子电网规模估计TI的轻微低估。改进的SST表示随后减少了大气稳定性以及轮毂高度附近的风速和子网格TI的模型偏差。在研究期间观测到的大型TI事件和中尺度天气系统对从模型中准确估计TI提出了挑战。由于准确模拟这些事件存在显著的不确定性,这表明总结子网格和解决的TI可能不是理想的解决方案。下一步有必要努力进一步提高模拟中尺度气流和云系统的技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wind Energy Science
Wind Energy Science GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
27.50%
发文量
115
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信