“Socioanalisi”: primi elementi per una riformulazione della teoria sociale come analisi critica della sociazione

G. Grossi
{"title":"“Socioanalisi”: primi elementi per una riformulazione della teoria sociale come analisi critica della sociazione","authors":"G. Grossi","doi":"10.4000/QDS.2044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Starting from deep-rooted crisis of contemporary social sciences, we need to reformulate our theoretical approach in order to enhancing interpretative knowledge of our social realities. The first step of this analytic program is to deconstruct the historical paradigm of “critical theory” as a hypostatic way to explain social reality in its totality. From this perspective I propose a passage from “critical theory” to “socioanalysis” seen as an analytical-descriptive process without standardization. From this point of view the analysis of sociation (socioanalysis on the analogy of psychoanalysis) is always a critical approach to social reality because its explicative frame is not “prescriptive” but only “possible” (that is polyvalent). In this analytical context we have to confront with concept of ambivalence. This means that “things are in one way but they also are in another way”: existence, social life, interaction, agency, thought cannot be unequivocally interpreted. From this point of view I discuss two examples of contemporary theories that are implicitly ambivalent: the non-critical theory of Bruno Latour and the pragmatic theory of criticism of Luc Boltanski.","PeriodicalId":55721,"journal":{"name":"Quaderni di Sociologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaderni di Sociologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/QDS.2044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Starting from deep-rooted crisis of contemporary social sciences, we need to reformulate our theoretical approach in order to enhancing interpretative knowledge of our social realities. The first step of this analytic program is to deconstruct the historical paradigm of “critical theory” as a hypostatic way to explain social reality in its totality. From this perspective I propose a passage from “critical theory” to “socioanalysis” seen as an analytical-descriptive process without standardization. From this point of view the analysis of sociation (socioanalysis on the analogy of psychoanalysis) is always a critical approach to social reality because its explicative frame is not “prescriptive” but only “possible” (that is polyvalent). In this analytical context we have to confront with concept of ambivalence. This means that “things are in one way but they also are in another way”: existence, social life, interaction, agency, thought cannot be unequivocally interpreted. From this point of view I discuss two examples of contemporary theories that are implicitly ambivalent: the non-critical theory of Bruno Latour and the pragmatic theory of criticism of Luc Boltanski.
“社会分析”:将社会理论重新表述为社会批判性分析的第一步
从当代社会科学的深层次危机出发,我们需要重新制定我们的理论方法,以增强我们对社会现实的解释性知识。这个分析计划的第一步是解构“批判理论”的历史范式,将其作为一种实体的方式来解释社会现实的整体。从这个角度来看,我提出了一个从“批判理论”到“社会分析”的过渡,被视为一个没有标准化的分析-描述过程。从这个角度来看,社会分析(类比精神分析的社会分析)始终是对社会现实的一种批判方法,因为它的解释框架不是“规定性的”,而只是“可能的”(即多价的)。在这种分析背景下,我们不得不面对矛盾心理的概念。这意味着“事物以一种方式存在,但它们也以另一种方式存在”:存在、社会生活、互动、代理、思想不能被明确地解释。从这个角度来看我讨论两个例子的当代理论隐含矛盾:非关键布鲁诺拉图理论和务实的Luc Boltanski的批评理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信