Friedrich Nietzsche contra C. S. Lewis: A Nietzschean critique of Christianity and retributive punishment

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
P. Jolley
{"title":"Friedrich Nietzsche contra C. S. Lewis: A Nietzschean critique of Christianity and retributive punishment","authors":"P. Jolley","doi":"10.1177/00346373231176265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I read the work of philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900) as a way to respond to anti-rehabilitative, pro-retributive arguments, such as ones found in C. S. Lewis’s “The Humanitarian Theory of Punishment” (1949/1987). Lewis’s article is founded upon many liberal values that figure prominently in modern discussions of moral philosophy, Christian ethics, and theology. First, I outline Lewis’s critique of the rehabilitative “Humanitarian Theory of Punishment.” Second, I trace Lewis’s Christian presuppositions to show how Lewis represents a distinctively Christian retributivism. Third, I explain how Nietzsche’s critique of punishment and of Christianity work together to resist the Christian retributivism found in Lewis’s work and in the US society. The goal of this article is to raise questions about the moral foundations of both punishment and Christianity to foster an open dialogue between philosophy and theology in what should be a joint effort to end the US culture of incarceration.","PeriodicalId":21049,"journal":{"name":"Review & Expositor","volume":"119 1","pages":"315 - 328"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review & Expositor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00346373231176265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, I read the work of philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900) as a way to respond to anti-rehabilitative, pro-retributive arguments, such as ones found in C. S. Lewis’s “The Humanitarian Theory of Punishment” (1949/1987). Lewis’s article is founded upon many liberal values that figure prominently in modern discussions of moral philosophy, Christian ethics, and theology. First, I outline Lewis’s critique of the rehabilitative “Humanitarian Theory of Punishment.” Second, I trace Lewis’s Christian presuppositions to show how Lewis represents a distinctively Christian retributivism. Third, I explain how Nietzsche’s critique of punishment and of Christianity work together to resist the Christian retributivism found in Lewis’s work and in the US society. The goal of this article is to raise questions about the moral foundations of both punishment and Christianity to foster an open dialogue between philosophy and theology in what should be a joint effort to end the US culture of incarceration.
弗里德里希·尼采与c.s.刘易斯:尼采式的对基督教和报复性惩罚的批判
在这篇文章中,我阅读了哲学家弗里德里希·尼采(1844-1900)的作品,以此回应反康复、支持报复的论点,比如C.S.Lewis的《人道主义惩罚理论》(1949/1987)中的论点。刘易斯的文章建立在许多自由主义价值观的基础上,这些价值观在现代道德哲学、基督教伦理和神学的讨论中占有突出地位。首先,我概述了刘易斯对康复的“人道主义惩罚理论”的批判。其次,我追溯了刘易斯的基督教预设,以展示刘易斯如何代表一种独特的基督教报复主义。第三,我解释了尼采对惩罚的批判和对基督教的批判是如何共同抵制刘易斯作品和美国社会中的基督教报复主义的。本文的目的是提出关于惩罚和基督教的道德基础的问题,以促进哲学和神学之间的公开对话,从而共同努力结束美国的监禁文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Review & Expositor
Review & Expositor RELIGION-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信