Flora of community managed forests of Palpa district, western Nepal

Pratiksha Shrestha, R. P. Chaudhary, K. Shrestha, D. R. Dangol
{"title":"Flora of community managed forests of Palpa district, western Nepal","authors":"Pratiksha Shrestha, R. P. Chaudhary, K. Shrestha, D. R. Dangol","doi":"10.3126/jnhm.v30i0.27540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Floristic diversity is studied based on gender in two different management committee community forests (Barangdi-Kohal jointly managed community forest and Bansa-Gopal women managed community forest) of Palpa district, west Nepal. Square plot of 10m×10m size quadrat were laid for covering all forest areas and maintained minimum 40m distance between two quadrats. Altogether 68 plots (34 in each forest) were sampled. Both community forests had nearly same altitudinal range, aspect and slope but differed in different environmental variables and members of management committees. All the species present in quadrate and as well as outside the quadrate were recorded for analysis. There were 213 species of flowering plant belonging to 67 families and 182 genera. Barangdi-Kohal JM community forest had high species richness i.e. 176 species belonging to 64 families and 150 genera as compared to Bansa-Gopal WM community forest with 143 species belonging to 56 families and 129 genera. According to different life forms and family and genus wise jointly managed forest has high species richness than in women managed forest. Both community forest are banned for fodder, fuel wood and timber collection without permission of management comities. There is restriction of grazing in JM forest, whereas no restriction of grazing in WM forest.","PeriodicalId":89691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of natural history museum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of natural history museum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jnhm.v30i0.27540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Floristic diversity is studied based on gender in two different management committee community forests (Barangdi-Kohal jointly managed community forest and Bansa-Gopal women managed community forest) of Palpa district, west Nepal. Square plot of 10m×10m size quadrat were laid for covering all forest areas and maintained minimum 40m distance between two quadrats. Altogether 68 plots (34 in each forest) were sampled. Both community forests had nearly same altitudinal range, aspect and slope but differed in different environmental variables and members of management committees. All the species present in quadrate and as well as outside the quadrate were recorded for analysis. There were 213 species of flowering plant belonging to 67 families and 182 genera. Barangdi-Kohal JM community forest had high species richness i.e. 176 species belonging to 64 families and 150 genera as compared to Bansa-Gopal WM community forest with 143 species belonging to 56 families and 129 genera. According to different life forms and family and genus wise jointly managed forest has high species richness than in women managed forest. Both community forest are banned for fodder, fuel wood and timber collection without permission of management comities. There is restriction of grazing in JM forest, whereas no restriction of grazing in WM forest.
尼泊尔西部帕尔帕区社区管理森林植物区系
在尼泊尔西部帕尔帕区的两个不同的管理委员会社区森林(Barangdi Kohal联合管理的社区森林和Bansa Gopal妇女管理的社区林)中,基于性别对植物多样性进行了研究。铺设了10米×10米大小的方形地块,覆盖所有林区,两个象限之间保持至少40米的距离。总共对68个地块(每个森林34个)进行了采样。两个群落森林的海拔范围、方位和坡度几乎相同,但在不同的环境变量和管理委员会成员方面有所不同。记录象限内和象限外的所有物种进行分析。有花植物213种,隶属于182属67科。Barangdi Kohal JM群落森林具有较高的物种丰富度,即隶属于64科150属的176种,而Bansa Gopal WM群落森林则有隶属于56科129属的143种。根据不同的生命形式和科属,明智的联合经营森林的物种丰富度高于女性经营森林。未经管理委员会许可,这两个社区森林都被禁止用于饲料、燃料木材和木材收集。JM森林有放牧限制,而WM森林没有放牧限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信