Reliability of the Five-Factor Model for Determining Parental Alienation

IF 0.9 4区心理学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES

American Journal of Family Therapy Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI:10.1080/01926187.2021.2021831

S. Morrison, R. Ring

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Mental health practitioners (MHPs) need a reliable assessment tool for parental alienation (PA). This study assesses the reliability of the Five-Factor Model (FFM) asserted to test for PA. The FFM contains five criteria; Yes, responses to each of the five criterion is asserted to indicate PA is occurring. Six vignettes were presented to respondents, who provided a response for each of the five criteria. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient indicated reliability with an average of 0.923 for all vignettes. The Cronbach Alpha values indicate consistency, with an average of 0.926. FFM was determined to be a reliable assessment tool for PA.

查看原文本刊更多论文

决定父母疏离的五因素模型的可靠性

摘要心理健康从业者（MHP）需要一个可靠的评估工具来评估父母疏远（PA）。本研究评估了五因素模型（FFM）用于PA测试的可靠性。FFM包含五个标准；是的，对五个标准中的每一个的响应都被断言，以表明PA正在发生。向受访者提供了六个小插曲，受访者对五个标准中的每一个都做出了回应。类内相关系数表明所有小插曲的可靠性平均为0.923。Cronbach Alpha值表示一致性，平均值为0.926。FFM被确定为PA的可靠评估工具。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

American Journal of Family Therapy Multiple-

CiteScore

2.90

自引率

7.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： The American Journal of Family Therapy continues to be the incisive, authoritative, independent voice in an ever-changing field. You will find the latest techniques for treating families; theory on normal and dysfunctional family relationships; research on sexuality and intimacy; the effects of traditional and alternative family styles; community approaches to family intervention; and more.