Uptake of conservation agriculture technology through farmer field schools in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Mozambique

IF 0.5 Q4 AGRONOMY
I. Cipriano, Didy O. Onautsu, T. D. Tarassoum, I. I. Adejumobi, B. Bolakonga
{"title":"Uptake of conservation agriculture technology through farmer field schools in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Mozambique","authors":"I. Cipriano, Didy O. Onautsu, T. D. Tarassoum, I. I. Adejumobi, B. Bolakonga","doi":"10.4314/jae.v26i1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study assessed the levels of usage of conservation agriculture technology in Kisangani, Democratic Republic of Congo and Angonia, Mozambique. A structured questionnaire was randomly administered to 192 farmers in each study site to collect data through a multistage sampling process. The study employed descriptive statistics and multinomial logistic regression to examine possible relationships among the study parameters. The results showed that land size used for conservation agriculture was a significant predictor in both study sites. Farmers’ intention to adopt depended on the services of vulgarisation of conservation agriculture technology. The results further showed that Kisangani farmers do not use the three-conservation agriculture technology at the same time, but they use crop rotation (54%). However, farmers use the three technologies (30%) simultaneously and soil cover (38%) in Angonia. The results suggest that efforts to promote adoption in Kisangani should be based on equal provision of extension services in all locations, and that the current farmer field schools (FFS) approach should be redesigned for contextualisation. For both study sites, the results imply that the use of FFS should be adapted to the use of farmer-to-farmer extension services, which can improve the upscaling of conservation agriculture to increase food security in a sustainable manner. ","PeriodicalId":43669,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Extension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Extension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/jae.v26i1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The study assessed the levels of usage of conservation agriculture technology in Kisangani, Democratic Republic of Congo and Angonia, Mozambique. A structured questionnaire was randomly administered to 192 farmers in each study site to collect data through a multistage sampling process. The study employed descriptive statistics and multinomial logistic regression to examine possible relationships among the study parameters. The results showed that land size used for conservation agriculture was a significant predictor in both study sites. Farmers’ intention to adopt depended on the services of vulgarisation of conservation agriculture technology. The results further showed that Kisangani farmers do not use the three-conservation agriculture technology at the same time, but they use crop rotation (54%). However, farmers use the three technologies (30%) simultaneously and soil cover (38%) in Angonia. The results suggest that efforts to promote adoption in Kisangani should be based on equal provision of extension services in all locations, and that the current farmer field schools (FFS) approach should be redesigned for contextualisation. For both study sites, the results imply that the use of FFS should be adapted to the use of farmer-to-farmer extension services, which can improve the upscaling of conservation agriculture to increase food security in a sustainable manner. 
刚果民主共和国和莫桑比克农民田间学校采用保护性农业技术
该研究评估了刚果民主共和国基桑加尼和莫桑比克安哥尼亚保护性农业技术的使用水平。对每个研究地点的192名农民随机进行结构化问卷调查,通过多阶段抽样过程收集数据。该研究采用描述性统计和多项逻辑回归来检验研究参数之间的可能关系。结果表明,在两个研究地点,用于保护性农业的土地面积都是一个重要的预测因素。农民的收养意愿取决于保护性农业技术的庸俗化服务。结果进一步表明,基桑加尼农民没有同时使用三种保护性农业技术,但他们使用轮作(54%)。然而,安哥拉的农民同时使用这三种技术(30%)和土壤覆盖率(38%)。研究结果表明,在基桑加尼促进收养的努力应以在所有地点平等提供推广服务为基础,并应重新设计目前的农民田间学校方法,以适应具体情况。对于这两个研究地点,研究结果表明,FFS的使用应适应农民对农民推广服务的使用,这可以提高保护性农业的规模,以可持续的方式提高粮食安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
25.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agricultural Extension (JAE) is devoted to the advancement of knowledge of agricultural extension services and practice through the publication of original and empirically based research, focusing on; extension administration and supervision, programme planning, monitoring and evaluation, diffusion and adoption of innovations; extension communication models and strategies; extension research and methodological issues; nutrition extension; extension youth programme; women-in-agriculture; extension, Climate Change and the environment, ICT, innovation systems. JAE will normally not publish articles based on research covering very small geographic area that cannot feed into policy except they present critical insights into emerging agricultural innovations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信