Point prevalence survey on antibiotic use in the hospitals of Mauritius

L. Veerapa-Mangroo, Harena Rasamoelina-Andriamanivo, M. Issack, E. Cardinale
{"title":"Point prevalence survey on antibiotic use in the hospitals of Mauritius","authors":"L. Veerapa-Mangroo, Harena Rasamoelina-Andriamanivo, M. Issack, E. Cardinale","doi":"10.3389/frabi.2022.1045081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background This study aims at determining the antibiotic prescribing pattern in admitted patients in the regional public hospitals of Mauritius. Methods A Point Prevalence Survey (PPS) on antibiotic use according to the World Health Organization Methodology for PPS on antibiotic use in hospitals, was carried out in 3 secondary public hospitals. Data was collected in February 2018 for Hospital 1 and in April-May 2019 for Hospital 2 and Hospital 3. Eligible inpatients were those who were hospitalized in the ward at 8.00 a.m. on the day of the survey. Results Among 915 inpatients, 482 (53%) were treated with 753 therapies or prescriptions of antibiotics, averaging 1.6 therapies or prescriptions per patient. Among those treated with antibiotics, an average of 88 patients (55%), 58 patients (36%) and 15 patients (9%) were given 1, 2 and 3 or more antibiotics respectively. The highest proportion of inpatients treated with antibiotics was among those with community acquired infections (n=243, 50%) followed by surgical prophylaxis (n=191, 40%). In the three hospitals, it was observed that third generation cephalosporins (ceftriaxone, cefotaxime), amoxicillin, metronidazole (parenteral) and ciprofloxacin accounted for more than 75% of total prescriptions and sixteen per cent (16%) of patients had an Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing report before prescription of antibiotics. Conclusion This study provides valuable information on antibiotic use in the country. Several misuses have been identified such as the excessive use of antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis, the high use of third generation cephalosporins and of the WATCH category of antibiotics. It also demonstrates a low percentage of Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing prior to prescription of antibiotics. This investigation shows that there is now a pressing need to repeat the Point Prevalence Survey on antibiotic use in hospitals in future whilst extending the survey to the private healthcare system to get a complete picture concerning antibiotic use in Mauritius.","PeriodicalId":73065,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in antibiotics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in antibiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frabi.2022.1045081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background This study aims at determining the antibiotic prescribing pattern in admitted patients in the regional public hospitals of Mauritius. Methods A Point Prevalence Survey (PPS) on antibiotic use according to the World Health Organization Methodology for PPS on antibiotic use in hospitals, was carried out in 3 secondary public hospitals. Data was collected in February 2018 for Hospital 1 and in April-May 2019 for Hospital 2 and Hospital 3. Eligible inpatients were those who were hospitalized in the ward at 8.00 a.m. on the day of the survey. Results Among 915 inpatients, 482 (53%) were treated with 753 therapies or prescriptions of antibiotics, averaging 1.6 therapies or prescriptions per patient. Among those treated with antibiotics, an average of 88 patients (55%), 58 patients (36%) and 15 patients (9%) were given 1, 2 and 3 or more antibiotics respectively. The highest proportion of inpatients treated with antibiotics was among those with community acquired infections (n=243, 50%) followed by surgical prophylaxis (n=191, 40%). In the three hospitals, it was observed that third generation cephalosporins (ceftriaxone, cefotaxime), amoxicillin, metronidazole (parenteral) and ciprofloxacin accounted for more than 75% of total prescriptions and sixteen per cent (16%) of patients had an Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing report before prescription of antibiotics. Conclusion This study provides valuable information on antibiotic use in the country. Several misuses have been identified such as the excessive use of antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis, the high use of third generation cephalosporins and of the WATCH category of antibiotics. It also demonstrates a low percentage of Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing prior to prescription of antibiotics. This investigation shows that there is now a pressing need to repeat the Point Prevalence Survey on antibiotic use in hospitals in future whilst extending the survey to the private healthcare system to get a complete picture concerning antibiotic use in Mauritius.
毛里求斯医院抗生素使用情况点流行率调查
背景本研究旨在确定毛里求斯地区公立医院住院患者的抗生素处方模式。方法根据世界卫生组织《医院抗生素使用点流行率调查方法》,在3所二级公立医院进行抗生素使用点患病率调查。数据收集于2018年2月1号医院,2019年4-5月2号医院和3号医院。符合条件的住院患者是调查当天上午8点在病房住院的患者。结果915例住院患者中,482例(53%)接受了753种抗生素治疗或处方,平均每位患者接受1.6种抗生素治疗。在接受抗生素治疗的患者中,平均88名患者(55%)、58名患者(36%)和15名患者(9%)分别服用了1、2和3种或更多的抗生素。接受抗生素治疗的住院患者比例最高的是社区获得性感染患者(n=243,50%),其次是手术预防患者(n=191,40%)。在这三家医院中,观察到第三代头孢菌素(头孢曲松、头孢噻肟)、阿莫西林、甲硝唑(非肠道)和环丙沙星占处方总数的75%以上,16%(16%)的患者在开具抗生素处方前有抗生素敏感性测试报告。结论本研究为我国抗生素的使用提供了有价值的信息。已经发现了一些滥用,如过度使用抗生素进行外科预防、大量使用第三代头孢菌素和WATCH类抗生素。它还表明,在开具抗生素处方之前,抗生素敏感性测试的百分比很低。这项调查表明,现在迫切需要在未来重复关于医院抗生素使用的点流行率调查,同时将调查扩展到私人医疗系统,以全面了解毛里求斯的抗生素使用情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信