Market value and related party's transactions: a panel data approach

Q2 Business, Management and Accounting
Najib H. S. Farhan, Faozi A. Almaqtari
{"title":"Market value and related party's transactions: a panel data approach","authors":"Najib H. S. Farhan, Faozi A. Almaqtari","doi":"10.1108/ajar-07-2022-0204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis research aims to examine the impact of RPTs and board of directors' characteristics on the market value of Indian listed banks. Further, this study evaluates the moderation effect of board composition on the association between RPTs banks’ market value.Design/methodology/approachThe sample size consists of 38 banks listed on Bombay stock exchange. The current study is based on secondary data for ten years from 2010 to 2019. Generalized Method of Moment (GMM) was used for estimating the results.FindingsSubsidiary transactions, board of directors' size, composition, diligence, promoters, remuneration and banks' size and leverage have a significant impact on the market value of Indian listed banks. Further, board of directors' composition positively moderates the association between RPTs and banks value measured by Tobin's. Furthermore, corporate governance characteristics have a significant impact on RPTs measured by total RPTs and all subsidiary transactions.Research limitations/implicationsThis research is limited only to listed banks whose data are available in the ProwessIQ database, which makes it difficult to generalize the findings on other unlisted banks. This research helps policymakers, investors and creditors to categorize RPTs into different groups to identify the harmful and beneficial once to the bank. The findings suggest that policymakers, investors and creditors should not consider all key personal transactions as harmful transactions; instead, the policymakers, investors and creditors should consider all subsidiary transactions as harmful in the absence of independent directors.Originality/valueThe present study contributes to the existing literature on RPTs by evaluating the interaction effect of board composition on the association between related party transactions and banks' value. Further, this research focuses on the financing industry; Indian banks, which has not been sufficiently researched in comparison to the non-financing industries.","PeriodicalId":33161,"journal":{"name":"AJAR Asian Journal of Accounting Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJAR Asian Journal of Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ajar-07-2022-0204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis research aims to examine the impact of RPTs and board of directors' characteristics on the market value of Indian listed banks. Further, this study evaluates the moderation effect of board composition on the association between RPTs banks’ market value.Design/methodology/approachThe sample size consists of 38 banks listed on Bombay stock exchange. The current study is based on secondary data for ten years from 2010 to 2019. Generalized Method of Moment (GMM) was used for estimating the results.FindingsSubsidiary transactions, board of directors' size, composition, diligence, promoters, remuneration and banks' size and leverage have a significant impact on the market value of Indian listed banks. Further, board of directors' composition positively moderates the association between RPTs and banks value measured by Tobin's. Furthermore, corporate governance characteristics have a significant impact on RPTs measured by total RPTs and all subsidiary transactions.Research limitations/implicationsThis research is limited only to listed banks whose data are available in the ProwessIQ database, which makes it difficult to generalize the findings on other unlisted banks. This research helps policymakers, investors and creditors to categorize RPTs into different groups to identify the harmful and beneficial once to the bank. The findings suggest that policymakers, investors and creditors should not consider all key personal transactions as harmful transactions; instead, the policymakers, investors and creditors should consider all subsidiary transactions as harmful in the absence of independent directors.Originality/valueThe present study contributes to the existing literature on RPTs by evaluating the interaction effect of board composition on the association between related party transactions and banks' value. Further, this research focuses on the financing industry; Indian banks, which has not been sufficiently researched in comparison to the non-financing industries.
市场价值与关联方交易:面板数据方法
本研究旨在考察rpt和董事会特征对印度上市银行市值的影响。进一步,本研究评估了董事会构成对rpt银行市值关联的调节作用。设计/方法/方法样本由38家在孟买证券交易所上市的银行组成。目前的研究是基于2010年至2019年10年的二手数据。采用广义矩量法(GMM)对结果进行估计。子公司交易、董事会规模、构成、尽职调查、发起人、薪酬、银行规模和杠杆对印度上市银行的市值有显著影响。此外,董事会构成正向调节rpt与托宾测量的银行价值之间的关联。此外,公司治理特征对以总rpt和所有子公司交易衡量的rpt有显著影响。研究局限性/意义本研究仅局限于上市银行,其数据可在ProwessIQ数据库中获得,这使得很难将研究结果推广到其他非上市银行。该研究有助于政策制定者、投资者和债权人将rpt分类为不同的群体,以确定对银行的有害和有益。研究结果表明,政策制定者、投资者和债权人不应将所有关键的个人交易都视为有害交易;相反,政策制定者、投资者和债权人应该认为,在没有独立董事的情况下,所有子公司交易都是有害的。原创性/价值本研究通过评估董事会构成对关联交易与银行价值关联的交互效应,对现有的RPTs文献做出了贡献。进一步,本文的研究重点是金融行业;与非金融行业相比,印度银行还没有得到充分的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJAR Asian Journal of Accounting Research
AJAR Asian Journal of Accounting Research Business, Management and Accounting-Accounting
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信