Contrasting intra-urban signatures of humid and dry heatwaves over Southern California

IF 2.6 3区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
A. Shreevastava, Colin Raymond, G. Hulley
{"title":"Contrasting intra-urban signatures of humid and dry heatwaves over Southern California","authors":"A. Shreevastava, Colin Raymond, G. Hulley","doi":"10.1175/jamc-d-22-0149.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nHeatwaves in California manifest as both dry and humid events. While both forms have become more prevalent, recent studies have identified a shift towards more humid events. Understanding the complex interactions of each heatwave type with the urban heat island are crucial for impacts, but remain understudied. Here, we address this gap by contrasting how dry versus humid heatwaves shape the intra-urban heat of greater Los Angeles (LA) area. We used a consecutive contrasting set of heatwaves from 2020 as a case study: a prolonged humid heatwave in August and an extremely dry heatwave in September. We used MERRA2 reanalysis data to compare mesoscale dynamics, followed by high-resolution Weather Research Forecast modeling over urbanized Southern California. We employ moist thermodynamic variables to quantify heat stress and perform spatial clustering analysis to characterize the spatiotemporal intra-urban variability. We find that despite temperatures being 10±3°C hotter in the September heatwave, the wet bulb temperature, closely related to the risk of human heat stroke, was higher in August. While dry and humid heat display different spatial patterns, three distinct spatial clusters emerge based on non-heatwave local climates. But both types of heatwaves diminish the intra-urban heat stress variability. Valley areas such as San Bernardino and Riverside experience the worst impacts with up to 6±0.5°C of additional heat stress during heatwave nights. Our results highlight the need to account for the disparity in small-scale heatwave patterns across urban neighborhoods in designing policies for equitable climate action.","PeriodicalId":15027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jamc-d-22-0149.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Heatwaves in California manifest as both dry and humid events. While both forms have become more prevalent, recent studies have identified a shift towards more humid events. Understanding the complex interactions of each heatwave type with the urban heat island are crucial for impacts, but remain understudied. Here, we address this gap by contrasting how dry versus humid heatwaves shape the intra-urban heat of greater Los Angeles (LA) area. We used a consecutive contrasting set of heatwaves from 2020 as a case study: a prolonged humid heatwave in August and an extremely dry heatwave in September. We used MERRA2 reanalysis data to compare mesoscale dynamics, followed by high-resolution Weather Research Forecast modeling over urbanized Southern California. We employ moist thermodynamic variables to quantify heat stress and perform spatial clustering analysis to characterize the spatiotemporal intra-urban variability. We find that despite temperatures being 10±3°C hotter in the September heatwave, the wet bulb temperature, closely related to the risk of human heat stroke, was higher in August. While dry and humid heat display different spatial patterns, three distinct spatial clusters emerge based on non-heatwave local climates. But both types of heatwaves diminish the intra-urban heat stress variability. Valley areas such as San Bernardino and Riverside experience the worst impacts with up to 6±0.5°C of additional heat stress during heatwave nights. Our results highlight the need to account for the disparity in small-scale heatwave patterns across urban neighborhoods in designing policies for equitable climate action.
对比南加州城市内部潮湿和干燥热浪的特征
加利福尼亚的热浪表现为干燥和潮湿事件。虽然这两种形式都变得越来越普遍,但最近的研究已经确定了向更潮湿事件的转变。了解每种热浪类型与城市热岛的复杂相互作用对影响至关重要,但仍未得到充分研究。在这里,我们通过对比干燥和潮湿热浪如何塑造大洛杉矶(LA)地区的城市内部热量来解决这一差距。我们使用了2020年连续的热浪对比作为案例研究:8月的长时间潮湿热浪和9月的极度干燥热浪。我们使用MERRA2再分析数据来比较中尺度动力学,然后使用高分辨率天气研究预报模型对南加州城市化进行模拟。我们采用湿热力学变量量化热应力,并进行空间聚类分析来表征城市内部的时空变异。我们发现,尽管9月份的热浪温度比8月份高10±3°C,但与人体中暑风险密切相关的湿球温度在8月份更高。干热和湿热表现出不同的空间格局,但基于非热浪局地气候,出现了三个不同的空间集群。但这两种类型的热浪都减少了城市内部的热应力变异性。圣贝纳迪诺和河滨等山谷地区受到的影响最严重,在热浪之夜,额外的热应力可达6±0.5°C。我们的研究结果强调,在制定公平的气候行动政策时,需要考虑到城市社区小规模热浪模式的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
97
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology (JAMC) (ISSN: 1558-8424; eISSN: 1558-8432) publishes applied research on meteorology and climatology. Examples of meteorological research include topics such as weather modification, satellite meteorology, radar meteorology, boundary layer processes, physical meteorology, air pollution meteorology (including dispersion and chemical processes), agricultural and forest meteorology, mountain meteorology, and applied meteorological numerical models. Examples of climatological research include the use of climate information in impact assessments, dynamical and statistical downscaling, seasonal climate forecast applications and verification, climate risk and vulnerability, development of climate monitoring tools, and urban and local climates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信