From Classroom to Industry: Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Decision-Making

Q3 Social Sciences
Bettina Mrusek, Stephanie K. Douglas
{"title":"From Classroom to Industry: Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Decision-Making","authors":"Bettina Mrusek, Stephanie K. Douglas","doi":"10.22488/OKSTATE.20.100218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The presence of human factors in aviation remains a critical area of research given the safety implications of human error.  Understanding what specific factors contribute to human error allows managers and operators to take steps to mitigate these hazards.  Several methods have been tested in the cockpit and cabin crew environments, but less attention has been given to the aviation maintenance sector, despite the prevalence of accidents resulting from human error.  With the introduction of AC-172A, the FAA validated the need for additional research and training on the role of human factors in aviation maintenance errors.  However, a key component in this process is often overlooked--the role of decision-making. In aviation maintenance, the environment can change rapidly.  Technicians must react and adjust their behavior, and their decision-making abilities, accordingly.  Human factors such as fatigue, pressure, and distractions can interrupt cognitive processes and judgment, and in turn, decision-making.  As technicians adapt to these environmental challenges, strategies must be in place to facilitate optimal decision-making.  Recommendations for addressing the presence of human factors in aviation maintenance and the resulting impact on the decision-making process include taking both a proactive and reactive approach to human error identification.  Proactively screening for individuals who are too risk-averse or too comfortable with taking risks can help hiring managers employ the right personnel equipped to make appropriate decisions in high consequence industries, such as aviation.  Additionally, by encouraging and reviewing hazard reports, steps can be taken to mitigate human error factors in the future.  Anonymous hazard reporting tools such as the REPAIRER allow maintenance managers to leverage existing (and FAA-required) safety management systems (SMS) by including a human factors analysis.","PeriodicalId":39089,"journal":{"name":"Collegiate Aviation Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegiate Aviation Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22488/OKSTATE.20.100218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The presence of human factors in aviation remains a critical area of research given the safety implications of human error.  Understanding what specific factors contribute to human error allows managers and operators to take steps to mitigate these hazards.  Several methods have been tested in the cockpit and cabin crew environments, but less attention has been given to the aviation maintenance sector, despite the prevalence of accidents resulting from human error.  With the introduction of AC-172A, the FAA validated the need for additional research and training on the role of human factors in aviation maintenance errors.  However, a key component in this process is often overlooked--the role of decision-making. In aviation maintenance, the environment can change rapidly.  Technicians must react and adjust their behavior, and their decision-making abilities, accordingly.  Human factors such as fatigue, pressure, and distractions can interrupt cognitive processes and judgment, and in turn, decision-making.  As technicians adapt to these environmental challenges, strategies must be in place to facilitate optimal decision-making.  Recommendations for addressing the presence of human factors in aviation maintenance and the resulting impact on the decision-making process include taking both a proactive and reactive approach to human error identification.  Proactively screening for individuals who are too risk-averse or too comfortable with taking risks can help hiring managers employ the right personnel equipped to make appropriate decisions in high consequence industries, such as aviation.  Additionally, by encouraging and reviewing hazard reports, steps can be taken to mitigate human error factors in the future.  Anonymous hazard reporting tools such as the REPAIRER allow maintenance managers to leverage existing (and FAA-required) safety management systems (SMS) by including a human factors analysis.
从课堂到行业:航空维修决策中的人为因素
鉴于人为失误对安全的影响,航空中人为因素的存在仍然是一个关键的研究领域。了解哪些具体因素会导致人为失误,使管理人员和操作员能够采取措施减轻这些危害。已经在驾驶舱和机组人员环境中测试了几种方法,但对航空维修部门的关注较少,尽管人为失误导致的事故很普遍。随着AC-172A的推出,美国联邦航空局确认了对人为因素在航空维修失误中的作用进行额外研究和培训的必要性。然而,这一过程中的一个关键组成部分往往被忽视——决策的作用。在航空维修中,环境可能会迅速变化。技术人员必须做出反应并相应地调整他们的行为和决策能力。疲劳、压力和分心等人为因素会干扰认知过程和判断,进而干扰决策。随着技术人员适应这些环境挑战,必须制定战略以促进最佳决策。关于解决航空维修中人为因素的存在及其对决策过程的影响的建议包括采取积极和被动的方法来识别人为错误。积极筛选那些过于厌恶风险或过于乐于承担风险的人,可以帮助招聘经理在航空等高后果行业雇佣合适的人员来做出适当的决策。此外,通过鼓励和审查危险报告,可以采取措施减少未来的人为错误因素。诸如REPAIRER之类的匿名危险报告工具允许维护经理通过包括人为因素分析来利用现有的(以及FAA要求的)安全管理系统(SMS)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Collegiate Aviation Review
Collegiate Aviation Review Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信