A Hong Kong study of working alliance inventory short form – therapist

IF 0.2 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Sharon Hsu, C. Yu
{"title":"A Hong Kong study of working alliance inventory short form – therapist","authors":"Sharon Hsu, C. Yu","doi":"10.1080/21507686.2017.1313285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The ability to build a strong therapeutic alliance has direct impact on successful therapy outcome. However, there is limited knowledge about the therapeutic alliance in Chinese culture. This study aims to validate the factorial structure of a Chinese short form of the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI-S) for therapists and examine the correlation of alliance scores between therapist and client. The sample included 39 local counsellors and 139 local clients, who completed the Hong Kong versions of the WAI-S after the first and third counselling sessions. The principal component factor analyses indicated that similar to our previous findings for clients, the original three-factor model was not a fit one in the Hong Kong context and the one-factor, 10-item model was the best solution. The client and therapist ratings had low but significant positive correlations. Considering also that the WAI-S could be bifurcated to form two reliable subscales (goal–task and bond), it appears that the WAI-S may be instrumental in directing local counsellors’ attention to cultural dynamics relating to the mismatch between therapeutic goals derived from Western models and certain collectivist values of Chinese clients.","PeriodicalId":42294,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy","volume":"8 1","pages":"100 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21507686.2017.1313285","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507686.2017.1313285","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT The ability to build a strong therapeutic alliance has direct impact on successful therapy outcome. However, there is limited knowledge about the therapeutic alliance in Chinese culture. This study aims to validate the factorial structure of a Chinese short form of the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI-S) for therapists and examine the correlation of alliance scores between therapist and client. The sample included 39 local counsellors and 139 local clients, who completed the Hong Kong versions of the WAI-S after the first and third counselling sessions. The principal component factor analyses indicated that similar to our previous findings for clients, the original three-factor model was not a fit one in the Hong Kong context and the one-factor, 10-item model was the best solution. The client and therapist ratings had low but significant positive correlations. Considering also that the WAI-S could be bifurcated to form two reliable subscales (goal–task and bond), it appears that the WAI-S may be instrumental in directing local counsellors’ attention to cultural dynamics relating to the mismatch between therapeutic goals derived from Western models and certain collectivist values of Chinese clients.
香港工作联盟库存短表研究-治疗师
建立一个强大的治疗联盟的能力直接影响到成功的治疗结果。然而,中国文化对治疗联盟的认识有限。本研究旨在验证临床治疗师工作联盟量表(WAI-S)的因子结构,并检验临床治疗师与来访者之间联盟得分的相关性。样本包括39名本地辅导员和139名本地客户,他们在第一次和第三次辅导后完成了香港版本的WAI-S。主成分因子分析显示,与我们之前对客户的研究结果相似,原来的三因素模型并不适合香港的情况,而一因素十项模型是最佳的解决方案。来访者和治疗师的评分有低但显著的正相关。考虑到WAI-S可以分为两个可靠的子量表(目标-任务和联系),似乎WAI-S可能有助于指导当地咨询师关注与西方模式衍生的治疗目标与中国来访者的某些集体主义价值观之间不匹配相关的文化动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信