Gaze cues vs. arrow cues at short vs. long durations

IF 1.7 4区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

VISUAL COGNITION Pub Date : 2022-10-21 DOI:10.1080/13506285.2022.2154878

Tarini Singh, Lars-Michael Schöpper, G. Domes, C. Frings

{"title":"Gaze cues vs. arrow cues at short vs. long durations","authors":"Tarini Singh, Lars-Michael Schöpper, G. Domes, C. Frings","doi":"10.1080/13506285.2022.2154878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Information processing is more efficient at cued relative to non-cued locations. A number of studies have examined whether non-predictive gaze cues are special due to their biological relevance. While most studies indicate that cueing effects of gaze cues and arrow cues are similar, one aspect remains to be examined – cue duration. Contrary to early findings, a number of studies have observed cueing effects at short durations for arrow cues. For gaze cues however, the evidence is more mixed. The present study therefore aims to directly compare the cueing effects of arrow and gaze cues at short and long durations. Participants (N = 30) performed a discrimination task and were presented with arrow and gaze cues for short or long durations. Cueing effects were measured at each duration for each cue type. Significant cueing effects were observed for both cue types at both short and long duration. Moreover, for both cue types, no difference was observed in the magnitude of cueing effects at short and long duration. The results suggest that both cue types cues can efficiently orient attention even at short cue durations, and that the biological relevance of gaze direction cues do not provide any advantage over arrows.","PeriodicalId":47961,"journal":{"name":"VISUAL COGNITION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VISUAL COGNITION","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2022.2154878","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Information processing is more efficient at cued relative to non-cued locations. A number of studies have examined whether non-predictive gaze cues are special due to their biological relevance. While most studies indicate that cueing effects of gaze cues and arrow cues are similar, one aspect remains to be examined – cue duration. Contrary to early findings, a number of studies have observed cueing effects at short durations for arrow cues. For gaze cues however, the evidence is more mixed. The present study therefore aims to directly compare the cueing effects of arrow and gaze cues at short and long durations. Participants (N = 30) performed a discrimination task and were presented with arrow and gaze cues for short or long durations. Cueing effects were measured at each duration for each cue type. Significant cueing effects were observed for both cue types at both short and long duration. Moreover, for both cue types, no difference was observed in the magnitude of cueing effects at short and long duration. The results suggest that both cue types cues can efficiently orient attention even at short cue durations, and that the biological relevance of gaze direction cues do not provide any advantage over arrows.

查看原文本刊更多论文

短时间和长时间的凝视提示与箭头提示

摘要相对于非提示位置，提示位置的信息处理效率更高。许多研究已经检验了非预测性凝视线索是否由于其生物学相关性而具有特殊性。虽然大多数研究表明，凝视线索和箭头线索的提示效果相似，但有一个方面有待研究——提示持续时间。与早期发现相反，许多研究已经观察到箭头提示在短时间内的提示效应。然而，对于凝视暗示，证据更为复杂。因此，本研究旨在直接比较箭头和凝视线索在短时间和长时间内的提示效果。参与者（N=30）执行辨别任务，并在短时间或长时间内获得箭头和凝视提示。在每种提示类型的每个持续时间测量提示效果。在短时间和长时间两种提示类型中都观察到了显著的提示效应。此外，对于这两种线索类型，在短时间和长时间的线索效应幅度上没有观察到差异。结果表明，即使在短的线索持续时间内，这两种线索类型的线索也能有效地引导注意力，而且凝视方向线索的生物学相关性与箭头相比没有任何优势。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

VISUAL COGNITION PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-

CiteScore

4.20

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Visual Cognition publishes new empirical research that increases theoretical understanding of human visual cognition. Studies may be concerned with any aspect of visual cognition such as object, face, and scene recognition; visual attention and search; short-term and long-term visual memory; visual word recognition and reading; eye movement control and active vision; and visual imagery. The journal is devoted to research at the interface of visual perception and cognition and does not typically publish papers in areas of perception or psychophysics that are covered by the many publication outlets for those topics.