Leges non dedignantur sacros canones imitari: Canonical Reinterpretation of Justinian's Novel 83.1 (=Authen. 6.12.1) in Lucius III's Decretals

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
Piotr Alexandrowicz
{"title":"Leges non dedignantur sacros canones imitari: Canonical Reinterpretation of Justinian's Novel 83.1 (=Authen. 6.12.1) in Lucius III's Decretals","authors":"Piotr Alexandrowicz","doi":"10.1353/bmc.2018.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relation between Roman law and canon law is a multifaceted and highly nuanced issue. The modest aim of this investigation is to present how medieval canonists elaborated on the relation between the two laws on the margins of their commentaries on two papal decretals from the late twelfth century. Both of them were issued by pope Lucius III, and they both referred to the passage from Justinian’s law that the canonists knew from the collection of his legislation in the medieval Authenticum. In it the emperor declared that secular laws should not refrain from imitating sacred rules.1 The research focuses on the most influential commentaries to the decretals written by canonists from the time they were issued up to Panormitanus. To common maxims that attempted to grasp the complexity of the relation between the two laws, such as ‘legista sine canonibus parum valet, canonista sine legibus nihil’ or ‘Ecclesia vivit lege romana’, one may add another maxim—‘leges non dedignantur sacros canones imitari’.2 It seems that both for medieval canonists","PeriodicalId":40554,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Medieval Canon Law-New Series","volume":"35 1","pages":"185 - 214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/bmc.2018.0002","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Medieval Canon Law-New Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/bmc.2018.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The relation between Roman law and canon law is a multifaceted and highly nuanced issue. The modest aim of this investigation is to present how medieval canonists elaborated on the relation between the two laws on the margins of their commentaries on two papal decretals from the late twelfth century. Both of them were issued by pope Lucius III, and they both referred to the passage from Justinian’s law that the canonists knew from the collection of his legislation in the medieval Authenticum. In it the emperor declared that secular laws should not refrain from imitating sacred rules.1 The research focuses on the most influential commentaries to the decretals written by canonists from the time they were issued up to Panormitanus. To common maxims that attempted to grasp the complexity of the relation between the two laws, such as ‘legista sine canonibus parum valet, canonista sine legibus nihil’ or ‘Ecclesia vivit lege romana’, one may add another maxim—‘leges non dedignantur sacros canones imitari’.2 It seems that both for medieval canonists
罗马法和教会法之间的关系是一个多方面和高度微妙的问题。适度的目的,这一调查是目前如何中世纪的圣徒详细阐述了他们的评论,从12世纪后期两个教皇法令的边缘之间的关系。它们都是由教皇卢修斯三世颁布的,它们都引用了查士丁尼律法中的一段内容,这些内容是圣徒们从查士丁尼律法的合集中了解到的。在诏书中,皇帝宣布世俗的法律不应该避免模仿神圣的规则研究的重点是最有影响力的评论,由圣徒写的法令,从他们被发布到全景。对于试图把握这两种法律之间关系复杂性的共同格言,例如“合法地与人交往”、“合法地与人交往”或“罗马教会的生命”,人们可以添加另一条格言——“合法地与人交往”似乎两者都是中世纪的圣徒
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信