PRELIMINARY COMPARISON OF THREE ACCOMMODATION MICRO FLUCTUATION REPORTING APPROACHES IN OCULAR STABILITY INVESTIGATION

Q3 Social Sciences
Azmir Ahmad, Chen AI HONG
{"title":"PRELIMINARY COMPARISON OF THREE ACCOMMODATION MICRO FLUCTUATION REPORTING APPROACHES IN OCULAR STABILITY INVESTIGATION","authors":"Azmir Ahmad, Chen AI HONG","doi":"10.46754/jssm.2022.12.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accommodation of micro fluctuation has been the subject of many studies of ocular stability. Although there are three existing micro fluctuation reporting approaches encompassing the standard deviation approach, root means square approach and Fourier transform analysis, the direct comparison of these approaches is lacking. This study aims to descriptively compare the three reporting approaches using a single subject in the initial analysis. Measurement was done on the right eye using an open-field autorefractor (WAM-5500 Grand Seiko Co., Ltd., Japan) via the dynamic mode while looking at a distant target. The standard deviation (SD) approach recorded 0.1723 D accommodation micro fluctuation which was nearly identical to the root means square (RMS) approach of 0.1719 D. As for the Fourier transform (FT) approach, the variation was apparent in the low-frequency but not in the high-frequency component. Additional analysis showed the correlation coefficient between RMS and SD, between FT and SD and between FT and RMS was at 0.5776, 0.4745 and 0.4276, respectively (all P-values <0.01). In conclusion, the accommodation micro fluctuation can be aptly described through the root means square approach as it has fewer errors than the standard deviation approach and is less complicated than the Fourier transform approach.","PeriodicalId":17041,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46754/jssm.2022.12.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accommodation of micro fluctuation has been the subject of many studies of ocular stability. Although there are three existing micro fluctuation reporting approaches encompassing the standard deviation approach, root means square approach and Fourier transform analysis, the direct comparison of these approaches is lacking. This study aims to descriptively compare the three reporting approaches using a single subject in the initial analysis. Measurement was done on the right eye using an open-field autorefractor (WAM-5500 Grand Seiko Co., Ltd., Japan) via the dynamic mode while looking at a distant target. The standard deviation (SD) approach recorded 0.1723 D accommodation micro fluctuation which was nearly identical to the root means square (RMS) approach of 0.1719 D. As for the Fourier transform (FT) approach, the variation was apparent in the low-frequency but not in the high-frequency component. Additional analysis showed the correlation coefficient between RMS and SD, between FT and SD and between FT and RMS was at 0.5776, 0.4745 and 0.4276, respectively (all P-values <0.01). In conclusion, the accommodation micro fluctuation can be aptly described through the root means square approach as it has fewer errors than the standard deviation approach and is less complicated than the Fourier transform approach.
眼稳定性调查中三种调节微波动报告方法的初步比较
调节微波动一直是许多眼部稳定性研究的主题。尽管现有的微观波动报告方法有三种,包括标准差方法、均方根方法和傅立叶变换分析,但缺乏对这些方法的直接比较。本研究旨在在初步分析中使用单个受试者对三种报告方法进行描述性比较。在右眼上使用开场自动折射器(WAM-5500 Grand Seiko Co.,有限公司,Japan)通过动态模式进行测量,同时观察远处的目标。标准差(SD)方法记录了0.1723D的调节微波动,这与0.1719D的均方根(RMS)方法几乎相同。至于傅立叶变换(FT)方法,这种变化在低频分量中很明显,但在高频分量中不明显。进一步分析显示,RMS与SD、FT与SD以及FT与RMS的相关系数分别为0.5776、0.4745和0.4276(P值均<0.01),调节微波动可以通过均方根方法来适当地描述,因为它比标准偏差方法具有更少的误差并且比傅立叶变换方法不那么复杂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT
JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sustainability Science and Management is an Open-Access and peer-reviewed journal aims to publish scientific articles related to sustainable science; i.e. an interaction between natural sciences, social science, technologies and management for sustainable development and wise use of resources. We particularly encourage manuscripts that discuss contemporary research that can be used directly or indirectly in addressing critical issues and sharing of advanced knowledge and best practices in sustainable development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信