{"title":"The negative cycle in Chinese","authors":"Barbara Meisterernst","doi":"10.1075/jhl.21026.mei","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The present discussion proposes that renewal processes in the domain of negation manifest themselves predominantly\n in the change from bi-morphemic, synthetic negation to analytic negation neg+aux by introducing a new auxiliary verb as\n verbal head. Some of these new verbs may subsequently be merged with the negator resulting into new bi-morphemic negation. The\n proposed analyticization process accounts for different kinds of complex negation, including aspectual and modal negation, the\n copula and negative focus markers. I propose a unified mechanism for the morpho-syntactic processes, which change the system of\n negation in Chinese. Two morpho-syntactic factors contribute to this particular grammaticalization process of Chinese: (1) the\n diachronically consistent head initial word order within the functional and the lexical (CP/vP) domains (with the\n exception of sentence-final particles); and (2) the morpho-phonological rule that negation has to attach directly to aux,\n i.e., to a weak verbal head. Based on particularly the second constraint, I propose that only the combination\n neg+aux\n mod leads to the emergence of new fused negators constituting the head of a Negative/Modal phrase,\n i.e., a negative phrase (NegP) with modal features. The renewal process of the verbal heads of bi-morphemic negation is caused by\n semantic bleaching and an increasing intransparency of the negator which triggers the grammaticalization of new (often defective)\n lexical verbs via upward movement from the lexical to the functional domain. It accounts for the grammaticalization of the\n aspectual negator wèi 未, of the\n (negative) copula of Early Archaic Chinese into focus marker and complementizer, and for the replacement of synthetic by analytic\n modal negation neg\n mod > neg+aux\n mod.","PeriodicalId":42165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.21026.mei","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The present discussion proposes that renewal processes in the domain of negation manifest themselves predominantly
in the change from bi-morphemic, synthetic negation to analytic negation neg+aux by introducing a new auxiliary verb as
verbal head. Some of these new verbs may subsequently be merged with the negator resulting into new bi-morphemic negation. The
proposed analyticization process accounts for different kinds of complex negation, including aspectual and modal negation, the
copula and negative focus markers. I propose a unified mechanism for the morpho-syntactic processes, which change the system of
negation in Chinese. Two morpho-syntactic factors contribute to this particular grammaticalization process of Chinese: (1) the
diachronically consistent head initial word order within the functional and the lexical (CP/vP) domains (with the
exception of sentence-final particles); and (2) the morpho-phonological rule that negation has to attach directly to aux,
i.e., to a weak verbal head. Based on particularly the second constraint, I propose that only the combination
neg+aux
mod leads to the emergence of new fused negators constituting the head of a Negative/Modal phrase,
i.e., a negative phrase (NegP) with modal features. The renewal process of the verbal heads of bi-morphemic negation is caused by
semantic bleaching and an increasing intransparency of the negator which triggers the grammaticalization of new (often defective)
lexical verbs via upward movement from the lexical to the functional domain. It accounts for the grammaticalization of the
aspectual negator wèi 未, of the
(negative) copula of Early Archaic Chinese into focus marker and complementizer, and for the replacement of synthetic by analytic
modal negation neg
mod > neg+aux
mod.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Historical Linguistics aims to publish, after peer-review, papers that make a significant contribution to the theory and/or methodology of historical linguistics. Papers dealing with any language or language family are welcome. Papers should have a diachronic orientation and should offer new perspectives, refine existing methodologies, or challenge received wisdom, on the basis of careful analysis of extant historical data. We are especially keen to publish work which links historical linguistics to corpus-based research, linguistic typology, language variation, language contact, or the study of language and cognition, all of which constitute a major source of methodological renewal for the discipline and shed light on aspects of language change. Contributions in areas such as diachronic corpus linguistics or diachronic typology are therefore particularly welcome.