Irina A. Lokhtina, M. Castelló, Agata A. Lambrechts, Erika Löfström, M. K. McGinn, I. Skakni, Inge van der Weijden
{"title":"The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on early career researcher activity, development, career, and well-being: the state of the art","authors":"Irina A. Lokhtina, M. Castelló, Agata A. Lambrechts, Erika Löfström, M. K. McGinn, I. Skakni, Inge van der Weijden","doi":"10.1108/sgpe-10-2021-0076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to identify the documented effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on early career researcher (ECR) activity, development, career prospects and well-being.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis is a systematic literature review of English language peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2021, which provided empirical evidence of the impact of the pandemic on ECR activity and development. The search strategy involved online databases (Scopus, Web of Science and Overton); well-established higher education journals (based on Scopus classification) and references in the retained articles (snowballing). The final sample included 11 papers.\n\n\nFindings\nThe evidence shows that ECRs have been affected in terms of research activity, researcher development, career prospects and well-being. Although many negative consequences were identified, some promising learning practices have arisen; however, these opportunities were not always fully realised. The results raise questions about differential effects across fields and possible long-term consequences where some fields and some scholars may be worse off due to priorities established as societies struggle to recover.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThere is a need for revised institutional and national policies to ensure that sufficient measures are implemented to support ECRs’ research work in a situation where new duties and chores were added during the pandemic.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper provides insights into the impacts of the initial societal challenges of the pandemic on ECRs across disciplines that may have long-lasting effects on their academic development and well-being.\n","PeriodicalId":42038,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sgpe-10-2021-0076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to identify the documented effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on early career researcher (ECR) activity, development, career prospects and well-being.
Design/methodology/approach
This is a systematic literature review of English language peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2021, which provided empirical evidence of the impact of the pandemic on ECR activity and development. The search strategy involved online databases (Scopus, Web of Science and Overton); well-established higher education journals (based on Scopus classification) and references in the retained articles (snowballing). The final sample included 11 papers.
Findings
The evidence shows that ECRs have been affected in terms of research activity, researcher development, career prospects and well-being. Although many negative consequences were identified, some promising learning practices have arisen; however, these opportunities were not always fully realised. The results raise questions about differential effects across fields and possible long-term consequences where some fields and some scholars may be worse off due to priorities established as societies struggle to recover.
Practical implications
There is a need for revised institutional and national policies to ensure that sufficient measures are implemented to support ECRs’ research work in a situation where new duties and chores were added during the pandemic.
Originality/value
This paper provides insights into the impacts of the initial societal challenges of the pandemic on ECRs across disciplines that may have long-lasting effects on their academic development and well-being.
目的本文旨在确定新冠肺炎大流行对早期职业研究人员(ECR)活动、发展、职业前景和幸福感的影响,这为新冠疫情对ECR活动和发展的影响提供了经验证据。搜索策略涉及在线数据库(Scopus、Web of Science和Overton);完善的高等教育期刊(基于Scopus分类)和保留文章中的参考文献(滚雪球)。最终样本包括11篇论文。研究结果有证据表明,ECRs在研究活动、研究人员发展、职业前景和幸福感方面都受到了影响。尽管发现了许多负面后果,但出现了一些有希望的学习做法;然而,这些机会并不总是完全实现。研究结果引发了人们对各个领域的差异效应以及可能的长期后果的质疑,因为在社会努力复苏的过程中,一些领域和一些学者的处境可能会更糟。实际含义有必要修订机构和国家政策,以确保在疫情期间增加了新的职责和杂务的情况下,实施足够的措施来支持ECRs的研究工作。原创性/价值本文深入了解了疫情最初的社会挑战对跨学科ECR的影响,这些影响可能会对他们的学术发展和福祉产生长期影响。