Cross-sectional study of the quality of neonatal care services in Armenia.

IF 1 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
S. H. Galstyan, Hrant Z Kalenteryan, Arshak S Djerdjerian, Hovhannes S Ghazaryan, Naira T Gharakhanyan, Viktoria Y Kalenteryan
{"title":"Cross-sectional study of the quality of neonatal care services in Armenia.","authors":"S. H. Galstyan, Hrant Z Kalenteryan, Arshak S Djerdjerian, Hovhannes S Ghazaryan, Naira T Gharakhanyan, Viktoria Y Kalenteryan","doi":"10.1108/IJHCQA-01-2019-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nThe purpose of this paper is to report the assessment results of the quality of neonatal care services in Armenia and to describe the identified obstacles to improving the quality of care for newborn infants.\n\n\nDESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH\nThe study carried out a cross-sectional descriptive design. The data were collected in health facilities with different levels of neonatal care that were selected employing a multi-stage, stratified purposeful sampling design. The quality of neonatal services was assessed using the generic WHO tool. Data collection was performed using face-to-face semi-structured interviews, hospital statistics, medical records and direct observations.\n\n\nFINDINGS\nIn 31 study hospitals, 31,976 deliveries were performed resulting in 31,701 live births and 734 stillbirths. About 85 percent of all neonatal deaths was attributable to early neonatal deaths with over 48 percent occurring during the first 24 h of life. The proportion of neonatal deaths was highest in infants with low birth weight constituting 92.8 percent of all neonatal deaths. The total neonatal mortality rate was 3.50 per 1,000 live births, whereas stillbirth rate and perinatal mortality rate were 22.60 and 25.26 per 1,000 total births in 2015. Specific indicators with relatively lower mean scores included neonatal resuscitation, early breastfeeding, monitoring of newborn conditions, neonatal sepsis, feeding standards, total parenteral nutrition, and infection treatment.\n\n\nORIGINALITY/VALUE\nGiven the limited scope of research on quality assessment, this paper provides valuable information on the status of quality of neonatal care services in Armenian health facilities. This work also extends the existing studies focused on quality assessment through applying the model of Avedis Donabedian with the structure-process-outcomes approach as a theoretical basis.","PeriodicalId":47455,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/IJHCQA-01-2019-0012","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-01-2019-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PURPOSE The purpose of this paper is to report the assessment results of the quality of neonatal care services in Armenia and to describe the identified obstacles to improving the quality of care for newborn infants. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH The study carried out a cross-sectional descriptive design. The data were collected in health facilities with different levels of neonatal care that were selected employing a multi-stage, stratified purposeful sampling design. The quality of neonatal services was assessed using the generic WHO tool. Data collection was performed using face-to-face semi-structured interviews, hospital statistics, medical records and direct observations. FINDINGS In 31 study hospitals, 31,976 deliveries were performed resulting in 31,701 live births and 734 stillbirths. About 85 percent of all neonatal deaths was attributable to early neonatal deaths with over 48 percent occurring during the first 24 h of life. The proportion of neonatal deaths was highest in infants with low birth weight constituting 92.8 percent of all neonatal deaths. The total neonatal mortality rate was 3.50 per 1,000 live births, whereas stillbirth rate and perinatal mortality rate were 22.60 and 25.26 per 1,000 total births in 2015. Specific indicators with relatively lower mean scores included neonatal resuscitation, early breastfeeding, monitoring of newborn conditions, neonatal sepsis, feeding standards, total parenteral nutrition, and infection treatment. ORIGINALITY/VALUE Given the limited scope of research on quality assessment, this paper provides valuable information on the status of quality of neonatal care services in Armenian health facilities. This work also extends the existing studies focused on quality assessment through applying the model of Avedis Donabedian with the structure-process-outcomes approach as a theoretical basis.
亚美尼亚新生儿护理服务质量的横断面研究。
目的本文旨在报告亚美尼亚新生儿护理服务质量的评估结果,并描述提高新生儿护理质量的障碍。设计/方法/方法本研究采用横断面描述性设计。数据是在具有不同新生儿护理水平的卫生机构中收集的,这些卫生机构采用多阶段、分层、有目的的抽样设计进行选择。使用世界卫生组织通用工具对新生儿服务质量进行了评估。数据收集采用面对面半结构化访谈、医院统计、医疗记录和直接观察。发现在31家研究医院,共进行了31976次分娩,导致31701例活产和734例死产。大约85%的新生儿死亡归因于早期新生儿死亡,其中超过48%发生在前24小时 生命的h。新生儿死亡比例最高的是低出生体重婴儿,占所有新生儿死亡的92.8%。2015年,新生儿总死亡率为3.50/1000活产,而死产率和围产期死亡率分别为22.60和25.26/1000。平均得分相对较低的具体指标包括新生儿复苏、早期母乳喂养、新生儿状况监测、新生儿败血症、喂养标准、全胃肠外营养和感染治疗。ORIGINALITY/VALUE鉴于质量评估的研究范围有限,本文提供了有关亚美尼亚卫生机构新生儿护理服务质量状况的宝贵信息。这项工作还通过应用Avedis-Donabedian模型,以结构-过程-结果方法为理论基础,扩展了现有的质量评估研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: ■Successful quality/continuous improvement projects ■The use of quality tools and models in leadership management development such as the EFQM Excellence Model, Balanced Scorecard, Quality Standards, Managed Care ■Issues relating to process control such as Six Sigma, Leadership, Managing Change and Process Mapping ■Improving patient care through quality related programmes and/or research Articles that use quantitative and qualitative methods are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信