Market value of the view restriction

IF 1.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT
I. Hajnal
{"title":"Market value of the view restriction","authors":"I. Hajnal","doi":"10.2478/otmcj-2019-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Based on the international literature, the effect of an existing panoramic view on the market value of properties is positive and significant. This value-adding factor varies by location and by type of view. In Central Europe, no such evaluation study has been elaborated until now. New building construction may restrict the existing panorama, and this is the other side of the same phenomenon. View restriction may result in stigmatization, which is a negative effect on the property. There are two major methodologies to observe the effect: revealed preference method (RPM) and stated preference method (SPM). One SPM approach is contingent valuation (CV), wherein well-informed stakeholders give their opinion about the impact caused by the investigated effect. The CV methodology, using the Delphi approach, was employed to observe the market value decrease in the cases of several restricted panorama situations in Budapest. Based on the research, this effect in Budapest is in line with the published western results. The result of the study can be used to support real estate developers and architects in their development decisions. This is an extended version of the article titled “The impact of view-restriction: a Delphi case study from Budapest”, presented at Creative Construction Conference 2018, CCC 2017, 30 June to 3 July 2018, Ljubljana, Slovenia.","PeriodicalId":42309,"journal":{"name":"Organization Technology and Management in Construction","volume":"11 1","pages":"1925 - 1932"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization Technology and Management in Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2019-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Based on the international literature, the effect of an existing panoramic view on the market value of properties is positive and significant. This value-adding factor varies by location and by type of view. In Central Europe, no such evaluation study has been elaborated until now. New building construction may restrict the existing panorama, and this is the other side of the same phenomenon. View restriction may result in stigmatization, which is a negative effect on the property. There are two major methodologies to observe the effect: revealed preference method (RPM) and stated preference method (SPM). One SPM approach is contingent valuation (CV), wherein well-informed stakeholders give their opinion about the impact caused by the investigated effect. The CV methodology, using the Delphi approach, was employed to observe the market value decrease in the cases of several restricted panorama situations in Budapest. Based on the research, this effect in Budapest is in line with the published western results. The result of the study can be used to support real estate developers and architects in their development decisions. This is an extended version of the article titled “The impact of view-restriction: a Delphi case study from Budapest”, presented at Creative Construction Conference 2018, CCC 2017, 30 June to 3 July 2018, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
市场价值的观点受到限制
从国际文献来看,现有的全景观对房产市场价值的影响是积极而显著的。这种增值因素因位置和景观类型而异。在中欧,到目前为止还没有编制这种评价研究报告。新建筑的建造可能会限制现有的全景,这是同一现象的另一面。视野限制可能导致污名化,这是对财产的负面影响。有两种主要的方法来观察效果:显示偏好法(RPM)和陈述偏好法(SPM)。一种SPM方法是条件评估(CV),其中消息灵通的利益相关者给出他们对所调查效果造成的影响的意见。使用德尔菲法的CV方法被用来观察布达佩斯几个受限制的全景情况下的市场价值下降。根据这项研究,布达佩斯的这种效应与西方公布的结果一致。研究结果可用于支持房地产开发商和建筑师的开发决策。本文是一篇题为“视图限制的影响:来自布达佩斯的德尔福案例研究”的文章的扩展版本,该文章发表于2018年6月30日至7月3日在斯洛文尼亚卢布尔雅那举行的创意建设会议,CCC 2017。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信