Inductive and Deductive Reasoning in Sports and Exercise Coaching Process: A Systematic Review

Ahmad Alhussin Alali, Azzam Ahmad Alhossin Alali, Mohd Hafizuddin Baki, Nor Ikhmar Madarsa, Nur Ikhwan Mohamad
{"title":"Inductive and Deductive Reasoning in Sports and Exercise Coaching Process: A Systematic Review","authors":"Ahmad Alhussin Alali, Azzam Ahmad Alhossin Alali, Mohd Hafizuddin Baki, Nor Ikhmar Madarsa, Nur Ikhwan Mohamad","doi":"10.17309/jltm.2023.2.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Skill acquisition in teaching a new physical exercise skill is quite similar in process to other skill-learning in general. In teaching physical exercise techniques, two teaching and learning approaches can be used. Most often instructors used the deductive method in teaching exercise techniques. But in a real-life setup, it is quite common to hear athletes learn exercise techniques on their own self, with limited guidance or exposure to proper steps or techniques (inductively).\nThe aim of the study. This study aimed at identifying the actual number of studies that have been conducted and/or compared the usage of deductive and inductive teaching approaches in teaching exercises or sports skills. \nMaterials and methods. This systematic review used PRISMA guidelines to locate related literature. Eligible papers were evaluated for integrity, and relevant findings were combined to enable thematic analysis.\nResults. Twenty-six studies have actually fulfilled the requirements standards and were selected for review and analysis. In total, 1430 participants participated in those selected studies. Except for four studies, other studies have been found to have a low risk of bias, which indicated the research to be more accurate. This review showed that most of the instructors (teachers, coaches) prefer to use the inductive method. Five studies used the inductive method and three studies used the deductive method directly. The other 18 studies used the deductive and inductive methods indirectly or combined with other approaches. The inductive approach method was more effective according to the results.\nConclusion. The inductive method for teaching exercise skills is said to be more preferred mainly due to a good response received from the students in the majority of the studies, and considered more effective for teaching a new exercise or sports skills. The deductive method has not been totally sidelined but it is less preferred.","PeriodicalId":52621,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Theory and Methodology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Learning Theory and Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17309/jltm.2023.2.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Skill acquisition in teaching a new physical exercise skill is quite similar in process to other skill-learning in general. In teaching physical exercise techniques, two teaching and learning approaches can be used. Most often instructors used the deductive method in teaching exercise techniques. But in a real-life setup, it is quite common to hear athletes learn exercise techniques on their own self, with limited guidance or exposure to proper steps or techniques (inductively). The aim of the study. This study aimed at identifying the actual number of studies that have been conducted and/or compared the usage of deductive and inductive teaching approaches in teaching exercises or sports skills.  Materials and methods. This systematic review used PRISMA guidelines to locate related literature. Eligible papers were evaluated for integrity, and relevant findings were combined to enable thematic analysis. Results. Twenty-six studies have actually fulfilled the requirements standards and were selected for review and analysis. In total, 1430 participants participated in those selected studies. Except for four studies, other studies have been found to have a low risk of bias, which indicated the research to be more accurate. This review showed that most of the instructors (teachers, coaches) prefer to use the inductive method. Five studies used the inductive method and three studies used the deductive method directly. The other 18 studies used the deductive and inductive methods indirectly or combined with other approaches. The inductive approach method was more effective according to the results. Conclusion. The inductive method for teaching exercise skills is said to be more preferred mainly due to a good response received from the students in the majority of the studies, and considered more effective for teaching a new exercise or sports skills. The deductive method has not been totally sidelined but it is less preferred.
归纳推理与演绎推理在体育锻炼指导过程中的系统评价
背景一项新的体育锻炼技能的教学过程中的技能习得与其他技能的学习过程非常相似。在体育锻炼技术的教学中,可以采用两种教学方法。教师在练习技巧的教学中经常使用演绎法。但在现实生活中,经常会听到运动员在有限的指导或接触适当的步骤或技术(归纳)的情况下,自学锻炼技巧。研究的目的。本研究旨在确定在练习或运动技能教学中使用演绎和归纳教学方法进行和/或比较的实际研究数量。材料和方法。本系统综述使用PRISMA指南查找相关文献。对符合条件的论文进行了完整性评估,并将相关结果结合起来进行专题分析。后果26项研究实际上达到了要求标准,并被选中进行审查和分析。总共有1430名参与者参与了这些选定的研究。除了四项研究外,其他研究的偏倚风险较低,这表明该研究更准确。该综述表明,大多数教师(教师、教练员)更喜欢使用归纳法。五项研究采用归纳法,三项研究直接采用演绎法。其他18项研究采用了演绎法和归纳法间接或与其他方法相结合的方法。从结果来看,归纳法更为有效。结论据说,归纳法教授运动技能更受欢迎,主要是因为在大多数研究中,学生的反应都很好,并且被认为对教授新的运动或运动技能更有效。演绎法并没有完全被边缘化,但它并不那么受欢迎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信