Growing hope: Island agriculture and refusing catastrophe in climate change adaptation in Fiji

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
D. Griswold
{"title":"Growing hope: Island agriculture and refusing catastrophe in climate change adaptation in Fiji","authors":"D. Griswold","doi":"10.24043/isj.181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In both media and policy, climate change is broadly framed as the promise of catastrophe for small island states such as Fiji. This framing is often used to attract adaptation investment in islands, the targets and directives of which are frequently market-based and oriented toward economic-growth development models. In Fiji, this takes the form of land tenure policy and efforts to attract investment to support agricultural modernization. Such a pattern is the source of scholarly and activist critique that climate change adaptation is nothing more than a repackaging of neoliberal development. This paper seeks to situate such critique alongside parallel attention to climate change adaptation practices emerging from alternative, hopeful frames and aimed at less national development driven efforts. In doing so, it centers adaptation as a space of unsettled struggle and asks, in what ways do climate change adaptation practices in Fiji align and conflict with dominant framing of island vulnerability and climate catastrophe, and how might they suggest alternative adaptive interventions that renegotiate these frames? Specifically, this paper focuses on efforts to promote ‘traditional’ agriculture throughout Fiji as an endogenous and hopeful form of adaptation, and one consistently opposed to efforts at agricultural modernization as an adaptation strategy.","PeriodicalId":51674,"journal":{"name":"Island Studies Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Island Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24043/isj.181","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In both media and policy, climate change is broadly framed as the promise of catastrophe for small island states such as Fiji. This framing is often used to attract adaptation investment in islands, the targets and directives of which are frequently market-based and oriented toward economic-growth development models. In Fiji, this takes the form of land tenure policy and efforts to attract investment to support agricultural modernization. Such a pattern is the source of scholarly and activist critique that climate change adaptation is nothing more than a repackaging of neoliberal development. This paper seeks to situate such critique alongside parallel attention to climate change adaptation practices emerging from alternative, hopeful frames and aimed at less national development driven efforts. In doing so, it centers adaptation as a space of unsettled struggle and asks, in what ways do climate change adaptation practices in Fiji align and conflict with dominant framing of island vulnerability and climate catastrophe, and how might they suggest alternative adaptive interventions that renegotiate these frames? Specifically, this paper focuses on efforts to promote ‘traditional’ agriculture throughout Fiji as an endogenous and hopeful form of adaptation, and one consistently opposed to efforts at agricultural modernization as an adaptation strategy.
越来越大的希望:斐济的岛屿农业和拒绝气候变化适应灾难
在媒体和政策上,气候变化被广泛认为是斐济等小岛屿国家的灾难。这种框架经常被用来吸引对岛屿的适应投资,其目标和指令往往以市场为基础,并以经济增长发展模式为导向。在斐济,这采取了土地保有政策和努力吸引投资以支持农业现代化的形式。这种模式是学术界和活动家批评的根源,他们认为气候变化适应只不过是对新自由主义发展的重新包装。本文试图将这种批评与对气候变化适应实践的平行关注放在一起,这些实践是从替代的、充满希望的框架中产生的,旨在减少国家发展驱动的努力。在这样做的过程中,它将适应作为一个悬而未决的斗争空间,并询问斐济的气候变化适应实践在哪些方面与岛屿脆弱性和气候灾难的主导框架相一致和冲突,以及它们如何建议重新谈判这些框架的替代适应干预措施?具体而言,本文侧重于在斐济全国推广“传统”农业,将其作为一种内生的、充满希望的适应形式,并一贯反对将农业现代化作为一种适应战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
26.70%
发文量
29
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信