Conflicting or co-existing logics – doing action research within the framework of a project in a university

IF 2.3 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS
Beata Jałocha, Ewa Bogacz-Wojtanowska, Anna Góral, Piotr Jedynak, G. Prawelska-Skrzypek
{"title":"Conflicting or co-existing logics – doing action research within the framework of a project in a university","authors":"Beata Jałocha, Ewa Bogacz-Wojtanowska, Anna Góral, Piotr Jedynak, G. Prawelska-Skrzypek","doi":"10.1108/ijmpb-08-2021-0213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe aim of the study was to illustrate how three different institutional logics, present in the implementation of action research, interact in a formalised project, in a traditional university setting.Design/methodology/approachThe article is empirical in nature and the research method used is an instrumental case study. The case was the implementation of action research within the framework of an educational project co-financed by EU funds, conducted in a Polish public university. The research process was conducted from September 2017 to November 2019. The following techniques were used: document analysis, in-depth interviews, participatory observation during the project. Constant comparative analysis was used as an analytical approach.FindingsThe study indicates that action research, project management and university management follow different “logics”. The dominant logic of action research is problem-solving, of project management is efficiency and of university management is compliance. These different logics and the relationship between them is explained in the paper.Originality/valueThe research enriches the ongoing discussion on logic multiplicity and project management in a new context – that of the university environment and combines the issue of the implementation of action research with broader conversations on institutional logics.","PeriodicalId":47374,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Managing Projects in Business","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Managing Projects in Business","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmpb-08-2021-0213","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThe aim of the study was to illustrate how three different institutional logics, present in the implementation of action research, interact in a formalised project, in a traditional university setting.Design/methodology/approachThe article is empirical in nature and the research method used is an instrumental case study. The case was the implementation of action research within the framework of an educational project co-financed by EU funds, conducted in a Polish public university. The research process was conducted from September 2017 to November 2019. The following techniques were used: document analysis, in-depth interviews, participatory observation during the project. Constant comparative analysis was used as an analytical approach.FindingsThe study indicates that action research, project management and university management follow different “logics”. The dominant logic of action research is problem-solving, of project management is efficiency and of university management is compliance. These different logics and the relationship between them is explained in the paper.Originality/valueThe research enriches the ongoing discussion on logic multiplicity and project management in a new context – that of the university environment and combines the issue of the implementation of action research with broader conversations on institutional logics.
冲突或共存的逻辑——在大学项目框架内进行行动研究
目的本研究的目的是说明在传统的大学环境中,行动研究实施中存在的三种不同的制度逻辑如何在正式的项目中相互作用。设计/方法论/方法这篇文章本质上是实证的,所使用的研究方法是一个工具性的案例研究。案例是在一个由欧盟基金共同资助的教育项目框架内,在一所波兰公立大学进行的行动研究。研究过程于2017年9月至2019年11月进行。使用了以下技术:文件分析、深入访谈、项目期间的参与式观察。经常比较分析被用作一种分析方法。研究结果表明,行动研究、项目管理和高校管理遵循不同的“逻辑”。行动研究的主导逻辑是解决问题,项目管理的主导逻辑为效率,大学管理的主导思维为合规。本文阐述了这些不同的逻辑及其相互关系。原创性/价值本研究丰富了在大学环境这一新背景下对逻辑多样性和项目管理的讨论,并将行动研究的实施问题与更广泛的制度逻辑对话相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
14.80%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Managing Projects in Business seeks to advance the theory, research and practice of all aspects of project management. IJMPB is looking for top quality theoretical and empirical research with the aims of: promoting the understanding of project management and; encouraging the publication of novel project management insights using multidisciplinary approaches rooted in social sciences. The journal provides a much-needed resource involved in project management by exploring new avenues not often addressed in the field of project management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信