Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for prevention of migraine headache in Japanese patients with episodic migraine: A phase 2 randomized controlled clinical trial

Q3 Medicine
F. Sakai, Akichika Ozeki, V. Skljarevski
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for prevention of migraine headache in Japanese patients with episodic migraine: A phase 2 randomized controlled clinical trial","authors":"F. Sakai, Akichika Ozeki, V. Skljarevski","doi":"10.1177/2515816320932573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab in comparison with placebo for the prevention of migraine in Japanese patients with episodic migraine. Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, which was conducted over 6 months, randomized adult patients received subcutaneous injections of galcanezumab (120 mg n = 115, 240 mg n = 114) or placebo (n = 230) once monthly. The primary endpoint was the overall mean change from baseline in the number of monthly migraine headache days. The key secondary outcome measures were response rates (≥50%, ≥75%, and 100%); the Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Role Function-Restrictive score; monthly migraine headache days requiring acute treatment; and Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S). Results: The mean change from baseline in monthly migraine headache days over months 1–6 was significantly (p < 0.001) greater for the 120-mg galcanezumab dose (−3.60 days) and the 240-mg galcanezumab dose (−3.36 days) compared with placebo (−0.59 days). Both the 120-mg and 240-mg doses of galcanezumab were superior compared with placebo for each of the key secondary endpoints except for PGI-S (only the 240-mg dose was superior). The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events were local injection-site reactions; erythema, swelling, pruritus, and pain were more commonly reported by patients who were treated with galcanezumab than those treated with placebo. Conclusion: The number of monthly migraine headache days was reduced with both doses of galcanezumab, and both doses were safe and well tolerated in Japanese patients with episodic migraine.","PeriodicalId":9702,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2515816320932573","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2515816320932573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Objective: This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab in comparison with placebo for the prevention of migraine in Japanese patients with episodic migraine. Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, which was conducted over 6 months, randomized adult patients received subcutaneous injections of galcanezumab (120 mg n = 115, 240 mg n = 114) or placebo (n = 230) once monthly. The primary endpoint was the overall mean change from baseline in the number of monthly migraine headache days. The key secondary outcome measures were response rates (≥50%, ≥75%, and 100%); the Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Role Function-Restrictive score; monthly migraine headache days requiring acute treatment; and Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S). Results: The mean change from baseline in monthly migraine headache days over months 1–6 was significantly (p < 0.001) greater for the 120-mg galcanezumab dose (−3.60 days) and the 240-mg galcanezumab dose (−3.36 days) compared with placebo (−0.59 days). Both the 120-mg and 240-mg doses of galcanezumab were superior compared with placebo for each of the key secondary endpoints except for PGI-S (only the 240-mg dose was superior). The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events were local injection-site reactions; erythema, swelling, pruritus, and pain were more commonly reported by patients who were treated with galcanezumab than those treated with placebo. Conclusion: The number of monthly migraine headache days was reduced with both doses of galcanezumab, and both doses were safe and well tolerated in Japanese patients with episodic migraine.
galcanezumab预防日本发作性偏头痛患者偏头痛的有效性和安全性:一项2期随机对照临床试验
目的:本研究旨在评估galcanezumab与安慰剂预防日本发作性偏头痛患者偏头痛的疗效和安全性。方法:在这项为期6个月的双盲安慰剂对照研究中,随机成年患者每月皮下注射一次galcanezumab(120 mg n=115240 mg n=114)或安慰剂(n=230)。主要终点是每月偏头痛天数与基线相比的总体平均变化。主要的次要结果指标是有效率(≥50%、≥75%和100%);偏头痛特异性生活质量问卷角色功能限制性评分;每月需要急性治疗的偏头痛天数;以及患者整体严重程度印象(PGI-S)。结果:与安慰剂(−0.59天)相比,120 mg galcanezumab剂量(−3.60天)和240 mg galcanizumab剂量的(−3.36天)在1-6个月内每月偏头痛天数与基线相比的平均变化显著(p<0.001)。与安慰剂相比,除PGI-S外,120 mg和240 mg剂量的galcanezumab在每个关键次要终点都优于安慰剂(只有240 mg剂量优于安慰剂)。最常见的治疗突发不良事件是局部注射部位反应;与安慰剂组相比,接受galcanezumab治疗的患者更常见红斑、肿胀、瘙痒和疼痛。结论:两种剂量的galcanezumab可减少每月偏头痛的天数,两种剂量对日本发作性偏头痛患者都是安全且耐受性良好的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cephalalgia Reports
Cephalalgia Reports Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信