{"title":"Analyzing Effects Of Climate Variability In The Nexus Of Informal Microfinance Institutions: A Case Study Of Tharaka South Subcounty, Kenya","authors":"C. G. Kaua, T. Thenya, J. Mutheu","doi":"10.12924/CIS2021.09010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Climate variability is variation of climate elements from the longterm mean state on all spatiotemporal scales. Climate variability affects microfinance institutions directly and indirectly through physical and transition risks. However, no studies have analyzed the effects of climate variability in relation to informal microfinance institutions. The study, therefore, aimed to analyze the effects of climate variability in relation to informal microfinance institutions. It used a descriptive study design and multi-stage sampling design. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis, descriptive analysis, and Kendall’s tau-b correlation analysis. The study found a positive trend in climate variability (τ b = 0.174, α>0.05). Local people are highly vulnerable to climate variability as confirmed by 98.7% of the respondents who observed that climate variability affects their livelihoods. This vulnerability stems from the effect of climate variability on access to capital assets and livelihood strategies. Vulnerability to climate variability has a significant negative effect on loan repayment performance, loan access and sustainability, and hence on informal microfinance performance (τ b = - 0.109**, P <0.01). Nevertheless, climate variability increases participation in informal microfinance institutions as shown by the positive relationship with the number of people who joined informal microfinance institutions (τ b = 0.239**, P <0.01) and the number formed per year (τ b = 0.137, P <0.01) from 1981 to 2018. This is because informal microfinance institutions help vulnerable households in building resilience to climate variability as observed by 80.8% of the respondents.. The characteristics of informal microfinance institutions have positive or negative relationships with vulnerability to climate variability. These relationships are and could be further leveraged upon to address effects of climate variability on informal microfinance institutions. Detailed contextual analysis of informal microfinance institutions in the nexus of climate variability is thus imperative to inform actions aimed at cushioning the groups and their members against the impacts.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12924/CIS2021.09010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Climate variability is variation of climate elements from the longterm mean state on all spatiotemporal scales. Climate variability affects microfinance institutions directly and indirectly through physical and transition risks. However, no studies have analyzed the effects of climate variability in relation to informal microfinance institutions. The study, therefore, aimed to analyze the effects of climate variability in relation to informal microfinance institutions. It used a descriptive study design and multi-stage sampling design. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis, descriptive analysis, and Kendall’s tau-b correlation analysis. The study found a positive trend in climate variability (τ b = 0.174, α>0.05). Local people are highly vulnerable to climate variability as confirmed by 98.7% of the respondents who observed that climate variability affects their livelihoods. This vulnerability stems from the effect of climate variability on access to capital assets and livelihood strategies. Vulnerability to climate variability has a significant negative effect on loan repayment performance, loan access and sustainability, and hence on informal microfinance performance (τ b = - 0.109**, P <0.01). Nevertheless, climate variability increases participation in informal microfinance institutions as shown by the positive relationship with the number of people who joined informal microfinance institutions (τ b = 0.239**, P <0.01) and the number formed per year (τ b = 0.137, P <0.01) from 1981 to 2018. This is because informal microfinance institutions help vulnerable households in building resilience to climate variability as observed by 80.8% of the respondents.. The characteristics of informal microfinance institutions have positive or negative relationships with vulnerability to climate variability. These relationships are and could be further leveraged upon to address effects of climate variability on informal microfinance institutions. Detailed contextual analysis of informal microfinance institutions in the nexus of climate variability is thus imperative to inform actions aimed at cushioning the groups and their members against the impacts.
气候变率是气候要素在所有时空尺度上从长期平均状态的变化。气候变化通过物理风险和过渡风险直接或间接地影响小额信贷机构。然而,没有研究分析了气候变化对非正式小额信贷机构的影响。因此,本研究旨在分析气候变化对非正式小额信贷机构的影响。采用描述性研究设计和多阶段抽样设计。数据分析采用专题分析、描述性分析和Kendall 's tau-b相关分析。研究发现气候变率呈正趋势(τ b = 0.174, α>0.05)。98.7%的受访者认为气候变率影响了他们的生计,这证实了当地人极易受到气候变率的影响。这种脆弱性源于气候变化对获取资本资产和生计战略的影响。气候变率脆弱性对贷款偿还绩效、贷款获取和可持续性产生显著的负面影响,从而对非正式小额信贷绩效产生显著影响(τ b = - 0.109**, P <0.01)。然而,气候变率增加了非正式小额信贷机构的参与,这与1981年至2018年加入非正式小额信贷机构的人数(τ b = 0.239**, P <0.01)和每年成立的人数(τ b = 0.137, P <0.01)呈正相关。这是因为80.8%的受访者指出,非正式小额信贷机构帮助脆弱家庭建立抵御气候变化的能力。非正式小额信贷机构的特征与易受气候变率影响的程度存在正相关或负相关关系。这些关系可以进一步加以利用,以解决气候变化对非正式小额信贷机构的影响。因此,必须对非正式小额信贷机构与气候变化的关系进行详细的背景分析,以便为旨在减轻这些群体及其成员的影响的行动提供信息。