In Vitro Cytotoxicity Analysis of Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers on Human Gingival Fibroblast Cells

IF 0.1 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Siti Aisyah Nadirah Ja’apar, S. Ichwan, M. Mustaffa
{"title":"In Vitro Cytotoxicity Analysis of Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers on Human Gingival Fibroblast Cells","authors":"Siti Aisyah Nadirah Ja’apar, S. Ichwan, M. Mustaffa","doi":"10.21315/aos2022.1702.oa05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluated the cytotoxicity of four bioceramic root canal sealers (bioceramic sealers): GuttaFlow Bioseal (GB), MTA Fillapex, CeraSeal Bioceramic root canal sealer (CS), and iRoot SP root canal sealer (iRSP). The viability of human gingival fibroblast (HGF) cells was used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of these bioceramic sealers. HGF cells were cultured and exposed to bioceramic sealer extracts for 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours at 37°C in an incubator humidified with 5% CO2. The 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide or MTT assay was conducted to determine cell viability at each incubation period and compared among all bioceramic sealers. The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed statistically significant differences between the positive control group and MTA Fillapex, MTA Fillapex and GB, and between GB and iRSP with p < 0.05. However, no statistical differences were found in cell viability for each material across all the incubation periods. GB was the least cytotoxic bioceramic sealer with cell viability exceeding 90% throughout the 72-hour incubation followed by CS, iRSP, and MTA Fillapex with non-cytotoxicity after 72-hour incubation, mild cytotoxicity after 72-hour incubation, and mild cytotoxicity after 72-hour incubation, respectively. However, iRSP showed moderate cytotoxicity, and MTA Fillapex was severely cytotoxic (< 30% cell viability) after 24-hour incubation.","PeriodicalId":44961,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orofacial Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orofacial Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/aos2022.1702.oa05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the cytotoxicity of four bioceramic root canal sealers (bioceramic sealers): GuttaFlow Bioseal (GB), MTA Fillapex, CeraSeal Bioceramic root canal sealer (CS), and iRoot SP root canal sealer (iRSP). The viability of human gingival fibroblast (HGF) cells was used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of these bioceramic sealers. HGF cells were cultured and exposed to bioceramic sealer extracts for 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours at 37°C in an incubator humidified with 5% CO2. The 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide or MTT assay was conducted to determine cell viability at each incubation period and compared among all bioceramic sealers. The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed statistically significant differences between the positive control group and MTA Fillapex, MTA Fillapex and GB, and between GB and iRSP with p < 0.05. However, no statistical differences were found in cell viability for each material across all the incubation periods. GB was the least cytotoxic bioceramic sealer with cell viability exceeding 90% throughout the 72-hour incubation followed by CS, iRSP, and MTA Fillapex with non-cytotoxicity after 72-hour incubation, mild cytotoxicity after 72-hour incubation, and mild cytotoxicity after 72-hour incubation, respectively. However, iRSP showed moderate cytotoxicity, and MTA Fillapex was severely cytotoxic (< 30% cell viability) after 24-hour incubation.
生物陶瓷根管封闭剂对人牙龈成纤维细胞的体外细胞毒性分析
本研究评估了四种生物陶瓷根管密封剂(生物陶瓷密封剂):GuttaFlow Bioseal (GB)、MTA Fillapex、CeraSeal bioceramic根管密封剂(CS)和iRoot SP根管密封剂(iRSP)的细胞毒性。采用人牙龈成纤维细胞(HGF)细胞活力评价生物陶瓷密封材料的细胞毒性。培养HGF细胞,并在5% CO2加湿的37℃培养箱中暴露于生物陶瓷密封剂提取物24小时、48小时和72小时。采用3-(4,5 -二甲基噻唑-2-基)- 2,5 -二苯基溴化四唑或MTT法测定每个孵育期的细胞活力,并比较所有生物陶瓷密封剂之间的差异。Kruskal-Wallis检验显示阳性对照组与MTA Fillapex、MTA Fillapex与GB、GB与iRSP之间差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。然而,在所有孵育期间,每种材料的细胞活力没有统计学差异。GB是细胞毒性最小的生物陶瓷密封剂,在72小时内细胞活力均超过90%,其次是CS、iRSP和MTA Fillapex, 72小时后细胞毒性为无,72小时后细胞毒性为轻度,72小时后细胞毒性为轻度。然而,经24小时孵育后,iRSP表现出中度细胞毒性,MTA Fillapex表现出严重的细胞毒性(< 30%细胞活力)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Orofacial Science
Archives of Orofacial Science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信