Voting Decisions and Racialized Fluidity in South Africa’s Metropolitan Municipalities

IF 1.9 1区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES
Marcel Paret, Carin Runciman
{"title":"Voting Decisions and Racialized Fluidity in South Africa’s Metropolitan Municipalities","authors":"Marcel Paret, Carin Runciman","doi":"10.1093/afraf/adad010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Do racial identities determine voting behaviour in post-apartheid South Africa? To address this question, we draw from a representative sample of 3,905 registered voters in five metropolitan municipalities: Johannesburg, Tshwane, Durban, Cape Town, and Nelson Mandela Bay. Our findings are mixed. On the one hand, Black voters were significantly more likely to vote for the African National Congress, whereas Coloured, Indian, and especially white voters were more likely to vote for the Democratic Alliance. This contrast comes into particular focus when we examine how voters acted over the course of a three-election period. On the other hand, race was far from a guaranteed predictor, not the least because many chose to abstain from voting—a trend that extended, though unevenly, to all racial groups. Importantly, though, the electorate did not split between party loyalists and consistent abstainers. Instead, fluidity predominated: About half of the electorate changed positions between elections, either by switching between parties or between voting and abstaining. Our findings thus demonstrate what we call ‘racialized fluidity’: Many voters are changing their voting decision from one election to the next, but in the aggregate, racial identity remains correlated with voting decisions.","PeriodicalId":7508,"journal":{"name":"African Affairs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adad010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Do racial identities determine voting behaviour in post-apartheid South Africa? To address this question, we draw from a representative sample of 3,905 registered voters in five metropolitan municipalities: Johannesburg, Tshwane, Durban, Cape Town, and Nelson Mandela Bay. Our findings are mixed. On the one hand, Black voters were significantly more likely to vote for the African National Congress, whereas Coloured, Indian, and especially white voters were more likely to vote for the Democratic Alliance. This contrast comes into particular focus when we examine how voters acted over the course of a three-election period. On the other hand, race was far from a guaranteed predictor, not the least because many chose to abstain from voting—a trend that extended, though unevenly, to all racial groups. Importantly, though, the electorate did not split between party loyalists and consistent abstainers. Instead, fluidity predominated: About half of the electorate changed positions between elections, either by switching between parties or between voting and abstaining. Our findings thus demonstrate what we call ‘racialized fluidity’: Many voters are changing their voting decision from one election to the next, but in the aggregate, racial identity remains correlated with voting decisions.
南非大城市的投票决定和种族流动性
种族身份是否决定了后种族隔离时代南非的投票行为?为了解决这个问题,我们从约翰内斯堡、茨瓦内、德班、开普敦和纳尔逊·曼德拉湾五个大都市的3905名登记选民中抽取了代表性样本。我们的发现喜忧参半。一方面,黑人选民明显更有可能投票给非洲人国民大会,而有色人种、印度人,尤其是白人选民更有可能投票给民主联盟。当我们考察选民在三次选举期间的表现时,这种对比就变得尤为突出。另一方面,种族远不是一个可靠的预测因素,尤其是因为许多人选择弃权——尽管不均匀,但这种趋势扩展到所有种族群体。然而,重要的是,选民并没有分裂为忠于政党的人和一贯弃权的人。相反,流动性占据了主导地位:大约一半的选民在两次选举之间改变了立场,要么是在政党之间转换,要么是在投票和弃权之间转换。因此,我们的研究结果证明了我们所谓的“种族化流动性”:许多选民在每次选举中都会改变他们的投票决定,但总的来说,种族身份仍然与投票决定相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Affairs
African Affairs Multiple-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
17.90%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: African Affairs is published on behalf of the Royal African Society. It publishes articles on recent political, social and economic developments in sub-Saharan countries. Also included are historical studies that illuminate current events in the continent. Each issue of African Affairs contains a substantial section of book reviews, with occasional review articles. There is also an invaluable list of recently published books, and a listing of articles on Africa that have appeared in non-Africanist journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信