Reconnecting the Patient: Why Telehealth Policy Solutions Must Consider the Deepening Digital Divide.

Laura C. Hoffman
{"title":"Reconnecting the Patient: Why Telehealth Policy Solutions Must Consider the Deepening Digital Divide.","authors":"Laura C. Hoffman","doi":"10.18060/26409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Article attempts to untangle the complicated web of providing telehealth to those populations it is potentially capable of further alienating from access to healthcare including: 1) race/minority populations, 2) aging adults, 3) individuals with disabilities, 4) non-English speakers, 5) individuals living in rural areas, 6) socioeconomic class, and 7) children, in order to advance the argument that telehealth can be successful in providing healthcare access to these populations. Rather than suggesting that telehealth simply \"cannot work\" for these populations, instead this Article considers how telehealth can and must meet the needs of these individuals through technology, access, and policy developments. First, this Article explains how telehealth is defined and how the definition has and can continue to influence policy development. Next, this Article explores the issues surrounding the \"digital divide\" and how this relates to telehealth use. Then this Article discusses how access to technology impacts particular populations. This Article then considers legislation and policy developments both at the federal and state level that have emerged thus far that could help overcome challenges of accessibility, affordability, and usability. Finally, this Article offers policy recommendations for ensuring that the delivery of telehealth can be accessible to those populations with potentially less access to technology to ensure telehealth's successful availability and use for these populations can continue beyond Covid-19.","PeriodicalId":73804,"journal":{"name":"Journal of law and health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of law and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18060/26409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This Article attempts to untangle the complicated web of providing telehealth to those populations it is potentially capable of further alienating from access to healthcare including: 1) race/minority populations, 2) aging adults, 3) individuals with disabilities, 4) non-English speakers, 5) individuals living in rural areas, 6) socioeconomic class, and 7) children, in order to advance the argument that telehealth can be successful in providing healthcare access to these populations. Rather than suggesting that telehealth simply "cannot work" for these populations, instead this Article considers how telehealth can and must meet the needs of these individuals through technology, access, and policy developments. First, this Article explains how telehealth is defined and how the definition has and can continue to influence policy development. Next, this Article explores the issues surrounding the "digital divide" and how this relates to telehealth use. Then this Article discusses how access to technology impacts particular populations. This Article then considers legislation and policy developments both at the federal and state level that have emerged thus far that could help overcome challenges of accessibility, affordability, and usability. Finally, this Article offers policy recommendations for ensuring that the delivery of telehealth can be accessible to those populations with potentially less access to technology to ensure telehealth's successful availability and use for these populations can continue beyond Covid-19.
重新连接患者:为什么远程医疗政策解决方案必须考虑不断加深的数字鸿沟。
本文试图理清为这些人群提供远程医疗的复杂网络,它可能会进一步疏远获得医疗保健的机会,包括:1)种族/少数民族人口,2)老年人,3)残疾人,4)非英语人士,5)生活在农村地区的个人,6)社会经济阶层,7)儿童,以推进远程医疗可以成功地为这些人群提供医疗保健的论点。本文并不认为远程医疗对这些人群“不起作用”,而是考虑远程医疗如何能够而且必须通过技术、可及性和政策发展来满足这些人的需求。首先,本文解释了远程医疗是如何定义的,以及该定义已经并将继续影响政策制定。接下来,本文探讨了围绕“数字鸿沟”的问题,以及这与远程医疗使用的关系。然后,本文将讨论获取技术如何影响特定人群。然后本文考虑了联邦和州一级的立法和政策发展,这些立法和政策发展迄今为止已经出现,可以帮助克服可访问性、可负担性和可用性方面的挑战。最后,本文提出了政策建议,以确保那些可能难以获得技术的人群能够获得远程医疗服务,并确保远程医疗在2019冠状病毒病之后能够继续成功提供和使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信