Training Patient Stakeholders Builds Community Capacity, Enhances Patient Engagement in Research

Hannah Cole McGrew, Lidia Regino, M. Bleecker, M. Téllez, Blanca Pedigo, Denisse Guerrero, Virginia Sandoval, Loida Varela, Janet Page-Reeves
{"title":"Training Patient Stakeholders Builds Community Capacity, Enhances Patient Engagement in Research","authors":"Hannah Cole McGrew, Lidia Regino, M. Bleecker, M. Téllez, Blanca Pedigo, Denisse Guerrero, Virginia Sandoval, Loida Varela, Janet Page-Reeves","doi":"10.54656/czlo2473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our philosophical framework for research with low-income Latino patients with diabetes prioritizes hiring research staff who share the culture and language of the population of study. Inclusive research design requires an active role by patient stakeholders with training opportunities in a collaborative learning environment to allow patient stakeholder data collectors (PSDCs) to build on existing strengths and expertise. To develop this manuscript, our team reflected on our collective experiences in implementing research-specific trainings for PSDCs. Although our population of study is known to be difficult to recruit and retain, our PSDCs have successfully enrolled participants on schedule, and attrition is low. Although language, institutional requirements, and funding restrictions presented training challenges, we overcame these by using a flexible approach and by incorporating the data collectors’ expertise in refining our protocols. We propose that our success in recruiting and retaining participants is a reflection of our engaged research strategy and framework and demonstrates that engagement promotes better science. However, our experience also demonstrates research institutions need to make policy and infrastructural improvements to reduce barriers and make engaged approaches more feasible.","PeriodicalId":73680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of community engagement and scholarship","volume":"13 1","pages":"99 - 106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of community engagement and scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54656/czlo2473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Our philosophical framework for research with low-income Latino patients with diabetes prioritizes hiring research staff who share the culture and language of the population of study. Inclusive research design requires an active role by patient stakeholders with training opportunities in a collaborative learning environment to allow patient stakeholder data collectors (PSDCs) to build on existing strengths and expertise. To develop this manuscript, our team reflected on our collective experiences in implementing research-specific trainings for PSDCs. Although our population of study is known to be difficult to recruit and retain, our PSDCs have successfully enrolled participants on schedule, and attrition is low. Although language, institutional requirements, and funding restrictions presented training challenges, we overcame these by using a flexible approach and by incorporating the data collectors’ expertise in refining our protocols. We propose that our success in recruiting and retaining participants is a reflection of our engaged research strategy and framework and demonstrates that engagement promotes better science. However, our experience also demonstrates research institutions need to make policy and infrastructural improvements to reduce barriers and make engaged approaches more feasible.
培训患者利益相关者可建立社区能力,增强患者对研究的参与
我们对低收入拉丁裔糖尿病患者的研究哲学框架优先考虑雇佣与研究人群文化和语言相同的研究人员。包容性研究设计需要患者利益相关者发挥积极作用,在协作学习环境中提供培训机会,使患者利益相关方数据收集器(PSDC)能够在现有优势和专业知识的基础上发展。为了编写这份手稿,我们的团队反思了我们在为PSDC实施特定研究培训方面的集体经验。尽管我们的研究人群很难招募和留住,但我们的PSDC已经如期成功招募了参与者,而且流失率很低。尽管语言、机构要求和资金限制带来了培训挑战,但我们通过使用灵活的方法,并在完善我们的协议时融入数据采集员的专业知识,克服了这些挑战。我们建议,我们在招募和留住参与者方面的成功反映了我们参与的研究战略和框架,并表明参与促进了更好的科学。然而,我们的经验也表明,研究机构需要改进政策和基础设施,以减少障碍,使参与的方法更加可行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信