An analysis of minoritisation in domestic homicide reviews in England and Wales

IF 2.3 2区社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES

Critical Social Policy Pub Date : 2022-11-03 DOI:10.1177/02610183221133052

K. Chantler, K. Bracewell, V. Baker, Kim Heyes, P. Traynor, Megan Ward

引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article considers how minoritisation features in Domestic Homicide Reviews (DHRs) in England and Wales and identifies critical learning in relation to addressing minoritisation. Five themes were identified: i) the invisibility of race, culture and ethnicity; ii) perceptions and experiences of services; iii) use of stereotypes and the culturalisation of domestic violence and abuse (DVA); iv) lack of interpreters; and v) DHR recommendations. Our analysis illustrates that statutory sector services should strengthen their responses to Black and minoritised victims by ensuring proper recording of cultural background is used to inform practice; engage professionally trained interpreters with an awareness of DVA; resist framing DVA as endemic to minoritised cultures; and enhance trust and confidence in public services within minoritised communities. The best examples of DHRs challenged service narratives and usually sought expertise from a specialist Black/minoritised DVA service or community organisation (frequently minoritised women's rights organisations).

查看原文本刊更多论文

英格兰和威尔士家庭凶杀案审查中的少数民族分析

本文考虑了在英格兰和威尔士的家庭杀人案评论(dhr)中，少数人是如何出现的，并确定了与解决少数人问题有关的关键学习。确定了五个主题:i)种族、文化和族裔的隐形性;Ii)对服务的认知和体验;(三)对家庭暴力和虐待的刻板印象和文化化;Iv)缺少口译员;DHR建议。我们的分析表明，法定部门服务应通过确保在实践中使用适当的文化背景记录来加强对黑人和少数族裔受害者的回应;聘请经过专业培训并了解DVA的口译员;抵制将DVA定义为少数民族文化特有的;增强少数族裔社区对公共服务的信任和信心。dhr的最佳例子挑战了服务叙述，通常向专业的黑人/少数民族DVA服务或社区组织(通常是少数民族妇女权利组织)寻求专业知识。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Critical Social Policy Multiple-

CiteScore

4.70

自引率

8.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Critical Social Policy provides a forum for advocacy, analysis and debate on social policy issues. We publish critical perspectives which: ·acknowledge and reflect upon differences in political, economic, social and cultural power and upon the diversity of cultures and movements shaping social policy; ·re-think conventional approaches to securing rights, meeting needs and challenging inequalities and injustices; ·include perspectives, analyses and concerns of people and groups whose voices are unheard or underrepresented in policy-making; ·reflect lived experiences of users of existing benefits and services;