Agreement on the Classification of Latent Class Membership Between Different Identification Constraint Approaches in the Mixture Rasch Model

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL
Yi-Jhen Wu, Insu Paek
{"title":"Agreement on the Classification of Latent Class Membership Between Different Identification Constraint Approaches in the Mixture Rasch Model","authors":"Yi-Jhen Wu, Insu Paek","doi":"10.1027/1614-2241/a000148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When using the mixture Rasch model, the model identification constraints are either to set the equal means for all classes in the assumed normal ability distributions (equal ability mean constraint in short), or to set the sum of item difficulties to be zero for each class. In real data analysis, however, both constraints are not always sufficient to establish a common scale across latent classes unless some items are specified as anchor items in the estimation. If these two conventional constraint approaches recover the class membership as good as the anchor item constraint approach, the conventional constraint approaches may be considered useful for the purpose of class membership classification. This study investigated agreement on class membership between one conventional constraint (the equal ability mean) and the anchor item constraint approaches. Results showed high agreement between these two constraint approaches, indicating that the conventional constraint of the equal mean ability approach may be used to recover the latent class membership although item profiles are not correctly estimated across latent classes.","PeriodicalId":18476,"journal":{"name":"Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for The Behavioral and Social Sciences","volume":"14 1","pages":"82–93"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for The Behavioral and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000148","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

When using the mixture Rasch model, the model identification constraints are either to set the equal means for all classes in the assumed normal ability distributions (equal ability mean constraint in short), or to set the sum of item difficulties to be zero for each class. In real data analysis, however, both constraints are not always sufficient to establish a common scale across latent classes unless some items are specified as anchor items in the estimation. If these two conventional constraint approaches recover the class membership as good as the anchor item constraint approach, the conventional constraint approaches may be considered useful for the purpose of class membership classification. This study investigated agreement on class membership between one conventional constraint (the equal ability mean) and the anchor item constraint approaches. Results showed high agreement between these two constraint approaches, indicating that the conventional constraint of the equal mean ability approach may be used to recover the latent class membership although item profiles are not correctly estimated across latent classes.
混合Rasch模型中不同识别约束方法之间潜在类隶属度分类的一致性
当使用混合Rasch模型时,模型识别约束要么为假设的正态能力分布中所有类别设置相等的均值(简称为等均值约束),要么将每个类别的项目难度之和设置为零。然而,在实际的数据分析中,这两个约束并不总是足以在潜在类别之间建立一个共同的尺度,除非在估计中指定一些项目作为锚定项目。如果这两种传统约束方法能像锚项约束方法那样很好地恢复类隶属度,那么传统约束方法对于类隶属度分类是有用的。本研究考察了一种传统约束(能力均值)与锚项目约束方法对班级成员的一致性。结果表明,这两种约束方法具有较高的一致性,表明传统的等平均能力约束方法可以用于恢复潜在类别的隶属度,尽管项目特征在潜在类别之间不能正确估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.50%
发文量
16
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信