Relazioni promiscue. Appunti per una possibile ridefinizione dello spazio comunicativo = Promiscuous relationships. Notes for a possible redefinition of the communicative space

IF 0.2 Q4 COMMUNICATION
Carlo Sorrentino, L. Solito, S. Pezzoli, L. Materassi
{"title":"Relazioni promiscue. Appunti per una possibile ridefinizione dello spazio comunicativo = Promiscuous relationships. Notes for a possible redefinition of the communicative space","authors":"Carlo Sorrentino, L. Solito, S. Pezzoli, L. Materassi","doi":"10.1285/I22840753N17P239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The key and monopolistic role played by the pandemic issue in the last months is a lens through which we can observe how the digital environment is reshaping the entire communicative space. In fact, the latter is constantly becoming denser, thanks to the plurality and heterogeneity of players, as well as to the expansion of their communication modalities. Starting from Bourdieu's notion of \"journalistic field\", we come to a new situation where voices of journalists and public sector's communicators are side by side with those of many other actors with other specific skills, who build a polyphonic and multidimensional communicative space. This multifaceted communicative space pushes us to rethink the categories of orthodoxy and informational heresy introduced by the French sociologist, considering the fact that many actors are now more interested in building their public visibility, by managing their different communication resources. In so doing, they can obtain a peculiar role and position in the communicative space, where transparency and the \"power of convocation\" become always more important. Based on these premises, this paper aims at exploring empirically how 10 different main actors of the public debate managed their communication strategies during the first emergency phase of the Italian lockdown. In order to test the theoretical framework here proposed, the authors investigate 6 different kinds of communication resources: reputational, institutional, professional, argumentative, performative and relational ones. The analysis focus on the activities of the following Facebook accounts: Civil Protection, Higher Institute of Health, Prime Minister, Lombardy Region, Veneto Region, as well as the personal ones of Prime Minister Conte, of Presidents Fontana and Zaia, and of the two currently most followed journalists on social media (Andrea Scanzi and Nicola Porro).","PeriodicalId":40441,"journal":{"name":"H-ermes-Journal of Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"H-ermes-Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1285/I22840753N17P239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The key and monopolistic role played by the pandemic issue in the last months is a lens through which we can observe how the digital environment is reshaping the entire communicative space. In fact, the latter is constantly becoming denser, thanks to the plurality and heterogeneity of players, as well as to the expansion of their communication modalities. Starting from Bourdieu's notion of "journalistic field", we come to a new situation where voices of journalists and public sector's communicators are side by side with those of many other actors with other specific skills, who build a polyphonic and multidimensional communicative space. This multifaceted communicative space pushes us to rethink the categories of orthodoxy and informational heresy introduced by the French sociologist, considering the fact that many actors are now more interested in building their public visibility, by managing their different communication resources. In so doing, they can obtain a peculiar role and position in the communicative space, where transparency and the "power of convocation" become always more important. Based on these premises, this paper aims at exploring empirically how 10 different main actors of the public debate managed their communication strategies during the first emergency phase of the Italian lockdown. In order to test the theoretical framework here proposed, the authors investigate 6 different kinds of communication resources: reputational, institutional, professional, argumentative, performative and relational ones. The analysis focus on the activities of the following Facebook accounts: Civil Protection, Higher Institute of Health, Prime Minister, Lombardy Region, Veneto Region, as well as the personal ones of Prime Minister Conte, of Presidents Fontana and Zaia, and of the two currently most followed journalists on social media (Andrea Scanzi and Nicola Porro).
充满希望的关系。关于可能重新定义交际空间的注释=混乱的关系。关于可能重新定义交际空间的注释
疫情问题在过去几个月里发挥的关键和垄断作用是我们可以观察数字环境如何重塑整个交流空间的一个镜头。事实上,由于参与者的多样性和异质性,以及他们交流方式的扩展,后者正在不断变得密集。从布迪厄的“新闻场”概念出发,我们看到了一个新的局面,记者和公共部门传播者的声音与许多其他具有特定技能的行动者的声音并肩,他们构建了一个复调和多维的传播空间。这种多方面的交流空间促使我们重新思考这位法国社会学家引入的正统和信息异端的类别,考虑到许多行动者现在更感兴趣的是通过管理他们不同的交流资源来建立他们的公众知名度。通过这样做,他们可以在交流空间中获得特殊的角色和地位,在交流空间里,透明度和“召集的力量”总是变得更加重要。基于这些前提,本文旨在实证探索在意大利封锁的第一个紧急阶段,公共辩论的10个不同主要参与者如何管理他们的沟通策略。为了检验本文提出的理论框架,作者调查了6种不同类型的传播资源:声誉、制度、专业、辩论、表演和关系资源。分析的重点是以下脸书账户的活动:公民保护、高等卫生研究所、总理、伦巴第大区、威尼托大区,以及孔特总理、丰塔纳总统和扎伊亚总统的个人账户,以及目前社交媒体上最受关注的两名记者(安德里亚·斯坎齐和尼古拉·波罗)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信