Ten year analysis of missed injuries at a major trauma centre in South Africa

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
Howard Wain , Damian L Clarke , Shelley Wall , Wanda Bekker , Victor Kong , John L Bruce
{"title":"Ten year analysis of missed injuries at a major trauma centre in South Africa","authors":"Howard Wain ,&nbsp;Damian L Clarke ,&nbsp;Shelley Wall ,&nbsp;Wanda Bekker ,&nbsp;Victor Kong ,&nbsp;John L Bruce","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>This analysis retrospectively reviews a tertiary trauma service's experience with missed injuries over a decade.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Trauma Service (PMTS) has accumulated electronic data on all admissions since 2012. This data informs the monthly morbidity and mortality conference, where adverse events are discussed. Records of all missed injuries were reviewed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the study period there were 17 254 individual patient admissions and 4 624 surgical procedures. A total of 159 missed injuries were identified. Ninety-six were injuries missed on investigation; 60 were missed on CT, 27 missed on x-ray, 1 on blood test, and 8 occurred during an unknown investigation. Thirty-nine injuries were missed during surgery; including thirteen colonic, five small bowel, five gastric, four duodenal, three vascular and three diaphragmatic injuries. Twenty-four injuries were missed on initial assessment, the majority of which were soft tissue injuries. Intraoperative missed injuries resulted in the greatest morbidity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Missed injuries remain a problem in modern trauma care. Injuries missed during initial clinical assessment and on imaging must be excluded by detailed secondary surveys and in depth review of all imaging. Injuries missed at operation carry greater morbidity than those missed outside the operating room. Ongoing vigilance is necessary to reduce the incidence of these injuries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery in practice and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262023000153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This analysis retrospectively reviews a tertiary trauma service's experience with missed injuries over a decade.

Methods

The Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Trauma Service (PMTS) has accumulated electronic data on all admissions since 2012. This data informs the monthly morbidity and mortality conference, where adverse events are discussed. Records of all missed injuries were reviewed.

Results

During the study period there were 17 254 individual patient admissions and 4 624 surgical procedures. A total of 159 missed injuries were identified. Ninety-six were injuries missed on investigation; 60 were missed on CT, 27 missed on x-ray, 1 on blood test, and 8 occurred during an unknown investigation. Thirty-nine injuries were missed during surgery; including thirteen colonic, five small bowel, five gastric, four duodenal, three vascular and three diaphragmatic injuries. Twenty-four injuries were missed on initial assessment, the majority of which were soft tissue injuries. Intraoperative missed injuries resulted in the greatest morbidity.

Conclusion

Missed injuries remain a problem in modern trauma care. Injuries missed during initial clinical assessment and on imaging must be excluded by detailed secondary surveys and in depth review of all imaging. Injuries missed at operation carry greater morbidity than those missed outside the operating room. Ongoing vigilance is necessary to reduce the incidence of these injuries.

南非一家大型创伤中心的十年漏诊分析
本分析回顾性地回顾了三级创伤服务的经验与错过的伤害超过十年。方法彼得马里茨堡大都会创伤服务中心(PMTS)收集了自2012年以来所有住院患者的电子数据。这些数据为讨论不良事件的每月发病率和死亡率会议提供信息。所有漏伤的记录都进行了审查。结果研究期间共收治患者17 254例,手术4 624例。共有159人未受伤。96处伤未查;60例CT未见,27例x线未见,1例血液检查未见,8例未知调查。术中漏诊39例;其中结肠损伤十三处,小肠损伤五处,胃损伤五处,十二指肠损伤四处,血管损伤三处,膈损伤三处。初步评估遗漏了24例损伤,其中大多数是软组织损伤。术中漏伤发生率最高。结论创伤漏诊仍然是现代创伤护理中存在的问题。在最初的临床评估和影像学中遗漏的损伤必须通过详细的二次调查和对所有影像学的深入审查来排除。手术中漏诊的伤情比手术外漏诊的伤情发病率更高。持续的警惕是必要的,以减少这些伤害的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信