Effectiveness of A Community Level Maternal Health Intervention in Improving Uptake of Postnatal Care in Migori County, Kenya

M. Gitonga, K. Ngure, E. Echoka
{"title":"Effectiveness of A Community Level Maternal Health Intervention in Improving Uptake of Postnatal Care in Migori County, Kenya","authors":"M. Gitonga, K. Ngure, E. Echoka","doi":"10.21106/IJTMRPH.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Provision of a continuum of care during pregnancy, delivery, and the postnatal period results in reduced maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Complications and lack of skilled postnatal care has consequences for mothers and babies. We examined to what extent a community level integrated maternal health intervention contributed to improvements in uptake of skilled care after delivery by pregnant women.  \nMethods: An Ex post quasi-experimental design was applied. Among 590 reproductive-aged women, we assessed the effectiveness of a community level integrated maternal health intervention and predictors of uptake of postnatal care. Descriptive, bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted.   \nResults: About three fifths (64%) of the women reported having sought postnatal care services at the health facility within six (6) weeks. Women in the intervention arm were 3.3 times more likely to take up postnatal care at a health facility (AOR= 3.31[95% CI 1.245 to 8.804] p=0.016). Women referred to the health facility for postnatal care by Community Health Workers (CHWs) were 2.72 times more likely to take up the services (AOR= 2.72[95% CI 1.05 to 7.07] p=0.039) than those not referred by CHWs. Distance to health facility (61%) was the major barrier, while some mothers did not feel the need for postnatal care (11%).  \nConclusion and Implications for Translation: Routine health education by trained providers at community level health facilities, coupled with enhanced CHWs' involvement can improve uptake of postnatal care. Ignorance and accessibility challenges are some barriers to the uptake of postnatal care. \nKey words: • Community • Maternal • Health • Intervention • Postnatal-Care • Kenya • MAISHA • Community Health Volunteers (CHVs) • Community Health Workers (CHWs) \n  \n© 2019 Gitonga et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.","PeriodicalId":93768,"journal":{"name":"International journal of translational medical research and public health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of translational medical research and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21106/IJTMRPH.70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Provision of a continuum of care during pregnancy, delivery, and the postnatal period results in reduced maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Complications and lack of skilled postnatal care has consequences for mothers and babies. We examined to what extent a community level integrated maternal health intervention contributed to improvements in uptake of skilled care after delivery by pregnant women.  Methods: An Ex post quasi-experimental design was applied. Among 590 reproductive-aged women, we assessed the effectiveness of a community level integrated maternal health intervention and predictors of uptake of postnatal care. Descriptive, bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted.   Results: About three fifths (64%) of the women reported having sought postnatal care services at the health facility within six (6) weeks. Women in the intervention arm were 3.3 times more likely to take up postnatal care at a health facility (AOR= 3.31[95% CI 1.245 to 8.804] p=0.016). Women referred to the health facility for postnatal care by Community Health Workers (CHWs) were 2.72 times more likely to take up the services (AOR= 2.72[95% CI 1.05 to 7.07] p=0.039) than those not referred by CHWs. Distance to health facility (61%) was the major barrier, while some mothers did not feel the need for postnatal care (11%).  Conclusion and Implications for Translation: Routine health education by trained providers at community level health facilities, coupled with enhanced CHWs' involvement can improve uptake of postnatal care. Ignorance and accessibility challenges are some barriers to the uptake of postnatal care. Key words: • Community • Maternal • Health • Intervention • Postnatal-Care • Kenya • MAISHA • Community Health Volunteers (CHVs) • Community Health Workers (CHWs)   © 2019 Gitonga et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
肯尼亚米戈里县社区层面孕产妇健康干预在提高产后护理接受率方面的效果
背景:在怀孕、分娩和产后期间提供连续的护理可以降低孕产妇和新生儿的发病率和死亡率。并发症和缺乏熟练的产后护理对母亲和婴儿都有影响。我们研究了社区层面的综合孕产妇健康干预在多大程度上有助于提高孕妇产后对熟练护理的接受程度。方法:采用事后准实验设计。在590名育龄妇女中,我们评估了社区层面综合孕产妇健康干预的有效性和产后护理的预测因素。进行了描述性、双变量和多变量分析。结果:大约五分之三(64%)的妇女报告说,她们在六(6)周内曾在卫生机构寻求产后护理服务。干预组的妇女在卫生机构接受产后护理的可能性是非卫生工作者的3.3倍(AOR=3.31[95%CI 1.245~8.804]p=0.016)。由社区卫生工作者转诊到卫生机构进行产后护理的妇女接受服务的可能性是未转诊妇女的2.72倍(AOR=2.72[95%CI 1.05-7.07]p=0.039)。与卫生机构的距离(61%)是主要障碍,而一些母亲认为不需要产后护理(11%)。结论和翻译意义:由社区一级卫生机构受过培训的提供者进行常规健康教育,再加上加强CHW的参与,可以提高产后护理的接受率。无知和可及性挑战是接受产后护理的一些障碍。关键词:•社区•孕产妇•健康•干预•产后护理•肯尼亚•MAISHA•社区卫生志愿者(CHV)•社区卫生工作者(CHW)©2019 Gitonga等人。这是一篇根据知识共享署名许可证条款分发的开放获取文章,该许可证允许在任何介质中不受限制地使用、分发和复制,只要原始作品被适当引用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信