Knowing, Being, and Doing Religion

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
TEMENOS Pub Date : 2020-12-21 DOI:10.33356/TEMENOS.97275
R. Illman, M. Czimbalmos
{"title":"Knowing, Being, and Doing Religion","authors":"R. Illman, M. Czimbalmos","doi":"10.33356/TEMENOS.97275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article introduces a new analytical model for researching vernacular religion, which aims to capture and describe everyday religiosity as an interplay between knowing, being, and doing religion. It suggests three processes that tie this triad together: continuity; change; and context. The model is envisaged as a tool for tracing vernacular religion in ethnographic data in a multidimensional yet structured framework that is sensitive to historical data and cultural context, but also to individual narratives and nuances. It highlights the relationship between self-motivated modes of religiosity and institutional structures, as well as influences from secular sources and various traditions and worldviews.The article is based on an ongoing research project focusing on everyday Judaism in Finland. The ethnographic examples illustrate how differently these dynamics play out in different life narratives, depending on varying emphases, experiences, and situations. By bringing together major themes recognized as relevant in previous research and offering an analytical tool for detecting them in ethnographic materials, the model has the potential to create new openings for comparative research, because it facilitates the interlinking of datasets across contexts and cultures. The article concludes that the model can be developed into a more generally applicable analytical tool for structuring and elucidating contemporary ethnographies, mirroring a world of rapid cultural and religious change.","PeriodicalId":43012,"journal":{"name":"TEMENOS","volume":"56 1","pages":"171-199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEMENOS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33356/TEMENOS.97275","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This article introduces a new analytical model for researching vernacular religion, which aims to capture and describe everyday religiosity as an interplay between knowing, being, and doing religion. It suggests three processes that tie this triad together: continuity; change; and context. The model is envisaged as a tool for tracing vernacular religion in ethnographic data in a multidimensional yet structured framework that is sensitive to historical data and cultural context, but also to individual narratives and nuances. It highlights the relationship between self-motivated modes of religiosity and institutional structures, as well as influences from secular sources and various traditions and worldviews.The article is based on an ongoing research project focusing on everyday Judaism in Finland. The ethnographic examples illustrate how differently these dynamics play out in different life narratives, depending on varying emphases, experiences, and situations. By bringing together major themes recognized as relevant in previous research and offering an analytical tool for detecting them in ethnographic materials, the model has the potential to create new openings for comparative research, because it facilitates the interlinking of datasets across contexts and cultures. The article concludes that the model can be developed into a more generally applicable analytical tool for structuring and elucidating contemporary ethnographies, mirroring a world of rapid cultural and religious change.
认识、存在和信仰宗教
本文介绍了一种新的研究本土宗教的分析模型,旨在捕捉和描述日常宗教信仰是认识、存在和从事宗教之间的相互作用。它提出了将这三者联系在一起的三个过程:连续性;改变以及背景。该模型被设想为在一个多维但结构化的框架中追踪民族志数据中的本土宗教的工具,该框架对历史数据和文化背景敏感,也对个人叙述和细微差别敏感。它强调了自我激励的宗教模式与制度结构之间的关系,以及来自世俗来源和各种传统和世界观的影响。这篇文章基于一个正在进行的研究项目,该项目专注于芬兰的日常犹太教。人种学的例子说明了这些动态在不同的生活叙事中是如何不同地发挥作用的,这取决于不同的重点、经历和情况。该模型汇集了以往研究中公认的相关主题,并提供了一种分析工具,用于在民族志材料中发现这些主题,因此有可能为比较研究创造新的机会,因为它有助于跨背景和文化的数据集互联。文章的结论是,该模型可以发展成为一种更普遍适用的分析工具,用于构建和阐释当代民族志,反映一个文化和宗教快速变化的世界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
TEMENOS
TEMENOS RELIGION-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
10
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信