{"title":"The Effect of Health Literacy Level on the Use of E-Health Applications","authors":"Derviş Ozan, M. Kılıç","doi":"10.6000/1929-6029.2023.12.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of the study is to measure the effect of health literacy (HL) level on the level of use of e-health applications among public employees, excluding health workers serving directly to the public and working in public institutions in the downtown area of Yozgat, Turkey. \nMethods: The study is cross-sectional and was conducted in 2021 among public employees. 476 public personnel working in state institutions in the city center participated in the study. Chi-square test, t-test, ANOVA, and multinomial logistic regression were used to evaluate the data. \nResults: Of the participants, 64.3% of them were male, 74.9% were married, 45.3% were in the 30-39 age group, and 60.9% were undergraduates. It was observed that 21.5% of the people in the research group had insufficient health literacy (SSL), 41.3% were problematic and 37.2% were sufficient. It was seen that the most used E-health application was E-pulse with 84.9%, followed by Life Fits into Home (LFH) and Central Physician Appointment System (CPAS) (64.3%), and the lowest was the hospitals' online systems (29.1%). The use of E-Nabız (e-Pulse) and E-Devlet (e-Government) SSI applications according to HL level was not found to be statistically significant (p>0.05). \nConclusion: The vast majority of public employees use E-Pulse, and approximately 2/3 of them use LFH and CPAS. Less than half of the participants in the study had a sufficient health-literacy level, and the effect on e-Health practices was not found significant.","PeriodicalId":73480,"journal":{"name":"International journal of statistics in medical research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of statistics in medical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2023.12.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of the study is to measure the effect of health literacy (HL) level on the level of use of e-health applications among public employees, excluding health workers serving directly to the public and working in public institutions in the downtown area of Yozgat, Turkey.
Methods: The study is cross-sectional and was conducted in 2021 among public employees. 476 public personnel working in state institutions in the city center participated in the study. Chi-square test, t-test, ANOVA, and multinomial logistic regression were used to evaluate the data.
Results: Of the participants, 64.3% of them were male, 74.9% were married, 45.3% were in the 30-39 age group, and 60.9% were undergraduates. It was observed that 21.5% of the people in the research group had insufficient health literacy (SSL), 41.3% were problematic and 37.2% were sufficient. It was seen that the most used E-health application was E-pulse with 84.9%, followed by Life Fits into Home (LFH) and Central Physician Appointment System (CPAS) (64.3%), and the lowest was the hospitals' online systems (29.1%). The use of E-Nabız (e-Pulse) and E-Devlet (e-Government) SSI applications according to HL level was not found to be statistically significant (p>0.05).
Conclusion: The vast majority of public employees use E-Pulse, and approximately 2/3 of them use LFH and CPAS. Less than half of the participants in the study had a sufficient health-literacy level, and the effect on e-Health practices was not found significant.
目的:本研究的目的是测量健康素养(HL)水平对公共雇员使用电子健康应用程序水平的影响,不包括直接为公众服务和在土耳其约兹加特市中心公共机构工作的卫生工作者。方法:该研究为横断面研究,于2021年在公职人员中进行。476名在市中心国家机构工作的公共人员参与了这项研究。采用卡方检验、t检验、方差分析和多项逻辑回归对数据进行评估。结果:参与者中,64.3%为男性,74.9%为已婚,45.3%为30-39岁年龄组,60.9%为本科生。据观察,研究组中21.5%的人健康素养(SSL)不足,41.3%有问题,37.2%足够。可以看出,最常用的E-health应用是E-pulse(84.9%),其次是Life Fits into Home(LFH)和中心医师预约系统(CPAS)(64.3%),最低的是医院的在线系统(29.1%)。根据HL水平使用E-Nabız(E-Pulse)和E-Devlet(E-Government)SSI应用程序的情况没有统计学意义(p>0.05)。结论:绝大多数公职人员使用E-Pulse,其中约2/3使用LFH和CPAS。该研究中只有不到一半的参与者具有足够的健康知识水平,对电子健康实践的影响并不显著。