Intraperitoneal instillation of bupivacaine and hydrocortisone for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anaesthesia – A prospective randomized study

Rajabhau Kshirsagar, S. Kuttarmare, P. Bhalerao, Sujit Kshirsagar
{"title":"Intraperitoneal instillation of bupivacaine and hydrocortisone for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anaesthesia – A prospective randomized study","authors":"Rajabhau Kshirsagar, S. Kuttarmare, P. Bhalerao, Sujit Kshirsagar","doi":"10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_88_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a minimally invasive procedure requiring less hospital stay and early mobilization as compared to open procedure. The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy of intraperitoneal instillation of hydrocortisone with bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients were enrolled in this prospective randomized study. Patients either received 0.125% bupivacaine (Group B) or 0.125% bupivacaine with 100 mg hydrocortisone (Group H) through intraperitoneal drain at the end of surgery. Pain was evaluated every two hourly using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for 24 h. Analgesics were required during this period and the presence of shoulder pain was also noted. Results: Patients in the hydrocortisone group had lower pain scores (2.17 ± 0.47) compared to the bupivacaine group (3.51 ± 1.10). This difference in the mean VAS score was statistically significant (P < 0.01). Similarly, patients requiring rescue analgesia were 60.86% in Group B and 39.14% in Group H and were statistically significant. Time for rescue analgesia was longer in Group H as compared to Group B. Conclusion: Intraperitoneal bupivacaine and hydrocortisone decrease pain and analgesic requirements more effectively than bupivacaine alone after laparoscopic cholecystectomy without causing significant adverse effects.","PeriodicalId":32328,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pain","volume":"37 1","pages":"110 - 114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_88_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a minimally invasive procedure requiring less hospital stay and early mobilization as compared to open procedure. The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy of intraperitoneal instillation of hydrocortisone with bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients were enrolled in this prospective randomized study. Patients either received 0.125% bupivacaine (Group B) or 0.125% bupivacaine with 100 mg hydrocortisone (Group H) through intraperitoneal drain at the end of surgery. Pain was evaluated every two hourly using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for 24 h. Analgesics were required during this period and the presence of shoulder pain was also noted. Results: Patients in the hydrocortisone group had lower pain scores (2.17 ± 0.47) compared to the bupivacaine group (3.51 ± 1.10). This difference in the mean VAS score was statistically significant (P < 0.01). Similarly, patients requiring rescue analgesia were 60.86% in Group B and 39.14% in Group H and were statistically significant. Time for rescue analgesia was longer in Group H as compared to Group B. Conclusion: Intraperitoneal bupivacaine and hydrocortisone decrease pain and analgesic requirements more effectively than bupivacaine alone after laparoscopic cholecystectomy without causing significant adverse effects.
腹腔注射布比卡因和氢化可的松用于脊髓麻醉下腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后镇痛的前瞻性随机研究
背景:腹腔镜胆囊切除术是一种微创手术,与开放手术相比,需要更少的住院时间和早期动员。本研究的目的是比较脊髓麻醉下腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者腹腔滴注氢化可的松和布比卡因的术后镇痛效果。材料和方法:60名患者被纳入这项前瞻性随机研究。患者在手术结束时通过腹膜内引流接受0.125%布比卡因(B组)或0.125%布哌卡因和100mg氢化可的松(H组)。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)每两小时评估一次疼痛,持续24小时。在此期间需要镇痛,并注意到肩部疼痛。结果:与布比卡因组(3.51±1.10)相比,氢化可的松组患者的疼痛评分(2.17±0.47)较低。平均VAS评分的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。同样,B组需要抢救性镇痛的患者为60.86%,H组为39.14%,具有统计学意义。与B组相比,H组的抢救镇痛时间更长。结论:腹腔镜胆囊切除术后,腹膜内布比卡因和氢化可的松比单独布比卡因更有效地降低疼痛和镇痛需求,不会造成显著的不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信