Bird Communities of Two Forest Types in Chitwan Valley, Nepal

IF 0.5 4区 生物学 Q4 ORNITHOLOGY
R. T. Engstrom, L. Edenius, T. Thapa, B. Bidari, Anil Gurung, G. Mikusiński
{"title":"Bird Communities of Two Forest Types in Chitwan Valley, Nepal","authors":"R. T. Engstrom, L. Edenius, T. Thapa, B. Bidari, Anil Gurung, G. Mikusiński","doi":"10.2326/osj.19.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Maintaining biological diversity is an important objective at Chitwan National Park (CNP), the most visited national park in Nepal. Given human uses and manipulations of forests both in and around CNP, developing forest management guidelines that can both support human use of trees and sustain the biological diversity of the forests is a high priority. In February 2009 we measured bird communities with point counts, woodpecker abundance with playback, and collected vegetation data in Sal Shorea robusta and riverine forests in CHP and a nearby community forest to provide basic data on bird-habitat associations with an emphasis on woodpeckers. Riverine forest had over twice the density of trees per ha (many small trees), higher tree species richness, and greater basal area than Sal forest. Sal forest had more large trees than riverine forest. We detected 71 bird species during the point counts in the study forests, 18 more during playback sessions, and an additional 12 species that were more associated with adjacent habitats (e.g., wetlands or flying overhead) for a total of 101 species. Among resident species, 31% were primary or secondary tree-cavity nesters. On average for point counts, we detected 29.5 bird species (2.2 woodpeckers) on transects located in riverine forest and 23.3 bird species (1.8 woodpeckers) in Sal forests, but the difference was not statistically significant. While riverine forest had several commonly occurring species not detected in Sal forest, the opposite was not the case. The regression of woodpecker species richness against large tree density in both Sal and riverine forests was positive, but not statistically significant. As a method of sampling woodpeckers, playback resulted in approximately twice the number of individuals and species compared to detection from point counts.","PeriodicalId":49009,"journal":{"name":"Ornithological Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ornithological Science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2326/osj.19.29","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORNITHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Maintaining biological diversity is an important objective at Chitwan National Park (CNP), the most visited national park in Nepal. Given human uses and manipulations of forests both in and around CNP, developing forest management guidelines that can both support human use of trees and sustain the biological diversity of the forests is a high priority. In February 2009 we measured bird communities with point counts, woodpecker abundance with playback, and collected vegetation data in Sal Shorea robusta and riverine forests in CHP and a nearby community forest to provide basic data on bird-habitat associations with an emphasis on woodpeckers. Riverine forest had over twice the density of trees per ha (many small trees), higher tree species richness, and greater basal area than Sal forest. Sal forest had more large trees than riverine forest. We detected 71 bird species during the point counts in the study forests, 18 more during playback sessions, and an additional 12 species that were more associated with adjacent habitats (e.g., wetlands or flying overhead) for a total of 101 species. Among resident species, 31% were primary or secondary tree-cavity nesters. On average for point counts, we detected 29.5 bird species (2.2 woodpeckers) on transects located in riverine forest and 23.3 bird species (1.8 woodpeckers) in Sal forests, but the difference was not statistically significant. While riverine forest had several commonly occurring species not detected in Sal forest, the opposite was not the case. The regression of woodpecker species richness against large tree density in both Sal and riverine forests was positive, but not statistically significant. As a method of sampling woodpeckers, playback resulted in approximately twice the number of individuals and species compared to detection from point counts.
尼泊尔奇特万山谷两种森林类型的鸟类群落
奇旺国家公园(Chitwan National Park, CNP)是尼泊尔游客最多的国家公园,保护生物多样性是其重要目标。鉴于人类对国家森林保护区内及其周围森林的利用和操纵,制定既能支持人类利用树木又能维持森林生物多样性的森林管理准则是一项高度优先事项。2009年2月,我们用点计数法测量了鸟类群落,用回放法测量了啄木鸟的丰度,并收集了CHP的Sal Shorea robusta和河流森林以及附近社区森林的植被数据,以提供以啄木鸟为重点的鸟类栖息地关联的基本数据。河滨林每公顷树木密度(许多小树)是盐湖林的两倍以上,树种丰富度更高,基底面积更大。萨尔森林比河滨森林有更多的大树。我们在研究森林的点计数中发现了71种鸟类,在回放过程中发现了18种鸟类,另外还有12种鸟类与邻近栖息地(如湿地或头顶飞行)的关系更密切,总共有101种。在留鸟种中,31%为初级或次级树洞巢。河滨林样带平均检出29.5种鸟类(啄木鸟2.2种),盐林样带平均检出23.3种鸟类(啄木鸟1.8种),差异无统计学意义。虽然河流森林中有几种常见的物种没有在萨尔森林中发现,但相反的情况并非如此。啄木鸟物种丰富度对大乔木密度的回归均为正,但不具有统计学意义。作为一种采样啄木鸟的方法,回放产生的个体和物种数量大约是点计数检测的两倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ornithological Science
Ornithological Science ORNITHOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ornithological Science publishes reviews, original articles, short communications and comments covering all aspects of ornithology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper. Manuscript are edited where necessary for clarify and economy. Ornithological Science aims to publish as rapidly as is consistent with the requirements of peer-review and normal publishing constraints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信