Digital cervical cancer screening: a reliable One-Stop method ?

Q4 Medicine
L. Al-Mehaisen, Tariq N Al-Shatanawi, N. Al-Husban, Soha Albeitawi, D. Hiasat, Lena Al-Kuran, O. Al-kuran
{"title":"Digital cervical cancer screening: a reliable One-Stop method ?","authors":"L. Al-Mehaisen, Tariq N Al-Shatanawi, N. Al-Husban, Soha Albeitawi, D. Hiasat, Lena Al-Kuran, O. Al-kuran","doi":"10.35516/jmj.v56i1.230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundWorldwide, cervical cancer (CC) is considered the fourth most common cancer in women. Globocandata stated 311,365 CC related mortalities in the world in 2018, 90% of them occurred in low-income countries. In Jordan, CC ranks as the 12th most common cancer among women. The primary aim of this report is to be able to decide if digital screening (DS) is reliable and worth using in our one stop gynecology clinics. Materials and MethodsThis study was done for all women who attended one stop out-patient gynecology services for routine CC screening between 1/1/2019 and 31/12/2019. Inclusion criteria requested women to be 18 years of age or more, healthy, and had previously normal cervical smear (conventional Pap smear (CPS) or Liquid based cytology (LBC)) i.e., all previous screening tests results were normal. ResultsA total number of 94 patients agreed to have the DS method done, mean age was 43 years. 25.5% were found to have abnormal screening results on DS. When compared to the national data of 12.5% abnormal smears in Liquid‐based cytology (LBC), there was a statistically significant difference in the numbers of abnormal screening results between both methods (p value of 0.000). LBC is used in most centers for CCS in Jordan ConclusionThe digital cervical screening method saves time and offers a one stop clinic management, therefore minimizing lost to follow up rate, and where colposcopy is indicated. Additionally, DS should be considered in low resource countries.","PeriodicalId":39681,"journal":{"name":"Jordan Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordan Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35516/jmj.v56i1.230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundWorldwide, cervical cancer (CC) is considered the fourth most common cancer in women. Globocandata stated 311,365 CC related mortalities in the world in 2018, 90% of them occurred in low-income countries. In Jordan, CC ranks as the 12th most common cancer among women. The primary aim of this report is to be able to decide if digital screening (DS) is reliable and worth using in our one stop gynecology clinics. Materials and MethodsThis study was done for all women who attended one stop out-patient gynecology services for routine CC screening between 1/1/2019 and 31/12/2019. Inclusion criteria requested women to be 18 years of age or more, healthy, and had previously normal cervical smear (conventional Pap smear (CPS) or Liquid based cytology (LBC)) i.e., all previous screening tests results were normal. ResultsA total number of 94 patients agreed to have the DS method done, mean age was 43 years. 25.5% were found to have abnormal screening results on DS. When compared to the national data of 12.5% abnormal smears in Liquid‐based cytology (LBC), there was a statistically significant difference in the numbers of abnormal screening results between both methods (p value of 0.000). LBC is used in most centers for CCS in Jordan ConclusionThe digital cervical screening method saves time and offers a one stop clinic management, therefore minimizing lost to follow up rate, and where colposcopy is indicated. Additionally, DS should be considered in low resource countries.
数字宫颈癌筛查:可靠的一站式方法?
背景在全球范围内,癌症被认为是癌症中第四常见的女性。环球数据显示,2018年全球有311365例CC相关死亡,其中90%发生在低收入国家。在约旦,CC在女性中排名第12位,是最常见的癌症。本报告的主要目的是能够确定数字筛查(DS)是否可靠,是否值得在我们的一站式妇科诊所使用。材料和方法本研究针对2019年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间参加一站式妇科门诊常规CC筛查的所有女性。纳入标准要求女性年满18岁或以上,身体健康,既往宫颈涂片正常(常规巴氏涂片(CPS)或液基细胞学(LBC)),即既往所有筛查结果均正常。结果共有94例患者同意采用DS法,平均年龄43岁。25.5%的DS筛查结果异常。与全国12.5%的液基细胞学(LBC)异常涂片数据相比,两种方法之间的异常筛查结果数量存在统计学上的显著差异(p值0.000)。约旦大多数CCS中心都使用LBC。结论数字宫颈筛查方法节省了时间,提供了一站式临床管理,从而最大限度地降低了失访率,并可用于阴道镜检查。此外,低资源国家应考虑DS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jordan Medical Journal
Jordan Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信