A mixed methods approach to the development of a Person-centred Curriculum Framework: surfacing person-centred principles and practices

D. O’Donnell, Caroline A W Dickson, A. Phelan, Donna Brown, G. Byrne, Shaun Cardiff, Neal F. Cook, Stephanie Dunleavy, Sergej Kmetec, B. McCormack
{"title":"A mixed methods approach to the development of a Person-centred Curriculum Framework: surfacing person-centred principles and practices","authors":"D. O’Donnell, Caroline A W Dickson, A. Phelan, Donna Brown, G. Byrne, Shaun Cardiff, Neal F. Cook, Stephanie Dunleavy, Sergej Kmetec, B. McCormack","doi":"10.19043/ipdj.12suppl.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Internationally, the development of person-centred healthcare services is of strategic importance. Healthcare education has the potential to contribute to this agenda by preparing the future workforce as person-centred practitioners. However, there is a lack of clarity about how to design, deliver and evaluate curricula to support person-centred learning and practice cultures. Aim: This article sets out to report on the methodological approach used to distil the key components of a Person-centred Curriculum Framework, and to critically evaluate the implications of this approach for curriculum development. Methods: The McKinsey 7S methodology underpinned this project. A multiphase, mixed methods design was used to synthesise evidence on the components of a person-centred curriculum framework. The eight design stages included an e-survey, telephone interviews, and multiple national and international stakeholder engagement events. Responses were translated into English and synthesised using an adapted directed content analysis approach. Through the stakeholder engagement events, evidence was then integrated until consensus was reached on the key curricular components. Results: A total of 24 academics from 10 countries across five disciplines took part in an e-survey, with responses in two languages. In addition, 31 telephone interviews were conducted with learners, educators and policymakers across six countries, in four languages. The survey and interview evidence was synthesised and presented in tabular form for each of the 7S categories, including a curriculum statement mapped to evidence exemplars, together with a set of thematic actions to assist programme teams in operationalising the Person-centred Curriculum Framework. Conclusions: The project, using a multiphase, mixed methods design, underpinned by the 7S methodology, combined with a multiplicity of stakeholder perspectives, provided a rigorous approach to developing a Person-centred Curriculum Framework that is philosophically and methodologically aligned with person-centred principles.","PeriodicalId":30387,"journal":{"name":"International Practice Development Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Practice Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19043/ipdj.12suppl.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Internationally, the development of person-centred healthcare services is of strategic importance. Healthcare education has the potential to contribute to this agenda by preparing the future workforce as person-centred practitioners. However, there is a lack of clarity about how to design, deliver and evaluate curricula to support person-centred learning and practice cultures. Aim: This article sets out to report on the methodological approach used to distil the key components of a Person-centred Curriculum Framework, and to critically evaluate the implications of this approach for curriculum development. Methods: The McKinsey 7S methodology underpinned this project. A multiphase, mixed methods design was used to synthesise evidence on the components of a person-centred curriculum framework. The eight design stages included an e-survey, telephone interviews, and multiple national and international stakeholder engagement events. Responses were translated into English and synthesised using an adapted directed content analysis approach. Through the stakeholder engagement events, evidence was then integrated until consensus was reached on the key curricular components. Results: A total of 24 academics from 10 countries across five disciplines took part in an e-survey, with responses in two languages. In addition, 31 telephone interviews were conducted with learners, educators and policymakers across six countries, in four languages. The survey and interview evidence was synthesised and presented in tabular form for each of the 7S categories, including a curriculum statement mapped to evidence exemplars, together with a set of thematic actions to assist programme teams in operationalising the Person-centred Curriculum Framework. Conclusions: The project, using a multiphase, mixed methods design, underpinned by the 7S methodology, combined with a multiplicity of stakeholder perspectives, provided a rigorous approach to developing a Person-centred Curriculum Framework that is philosophically and methodologically aligned with person-centred principles.
发展以人为本的课程框架的混合方法:以人为本的原则和实践
背景:在国际上,发展以人为本的医疗保健服务具有重要的战略意义。医疗保健教育有潜力为这一议程做出贡献,为未来的劳动力做好准备,成为以人为本的从业者。然而,在如何设计、提供和评估课程以支持以人为本的学习和实践文化方面缺乏明确的规定。目的:本文旨在报告用于提炼以人为本的课程框架的关键组成部分的方法学方法,并批判性地评估这种方法对课程开发的影响。方法:麦肯锡7S方法论支撑了这个项目。一个多阶段,混合方法设计被用来综合证据的组成部分,以人为本的课程框架。八个设计阶段包括电子调查、电话访谈和多个国家和国际利益相关者参与活动。回答被翻译成英语,并使用适应的定向内容分析方法进行合成。通过利益相关者参与活动,然后整合证据,直到就关键课程组成部分达成共识。结果:共有来自10个国家、5个学科的24名学者参与了一项电子调查,问卷以两种语言作答。此外,我们还用四种语言对六个国家的学习者、教育工作者和政策制定者进行了31次电话采访。对调查和访谈的证据进行了综合,并以表格形式呈现了7S类别中的每一个类别,包括一份映射到证据范例的课程说明,以及一套主题行动,以协助项目团队实施以人为本的课程框架。结论:该项目采用多阶段混合方法设计,以7S方法为基础,结合多种利益相关者的观点,提供了一种严格的方法来开发以人为本的课程框架,该框架在哲学和方法上与以人为本的原则保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信