"I knew the sound well": Rhetorical Mockery in "The Tell-Tale Heart"

IF 0.2 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
John A. Dern
{"title":"\"I knew the sound well\": Rhetorical Mockery in \"The Tell-Tale Heart\"","authors":"John A. Dern","doi":"10.5325/edgallpoerev.22.2.0312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Like the Saxon king Alfred the Great, the narrator of \"The Tell-Tale Heart\" hears \"with both his ears.\" However, whereas Alfred's chronicler, Bishop Asser, describes Alfred's talent for listening as a complement to the king's eager rationality, the narrator of \"The Tell-Tale Heart,\" who also hears \"with both his ears,\" is eager but not rational. He characterizes his acute hearing as a happy byproduct of an unnamed \"disease,\" arguing that it validates his claim of sanity, but his hearing is actually a vehicle for Poe's irony. While drawing on prior criticism, this article stresses how Poe's artistic control throughout the tale undermines the narrator's pretense of self-control. Thus, where the narrator calmly claims that mysterious vibrations from an old man's \"Evil Eye\" drove him to murder, Poe ironically emphasizes that sound is the character's undoing, ultimately producing a kind of aural nausea that the narrator re-experiences in the present as he tells an unidentified auditor how he murdered the old man. This nausea is what caused him to spew forth his confession of murder for the police originally and what causes him to do so again in the telling of events for his auditor. Poe particularly displays his artistic control with repetitions, rhetorically mocking the narrator's claim that heightened hearing demonstrates his sanity through the text's insistently repeated versions of the word \"ear,\" but he also displays his control through the rhetorical device of deixis, which derides the storyteller's inability to separate the narratorial past from the narratorial present.","PeriodicalId":40986,"journal":{"name":"Edgar Allan Poe Review","volume":"22 1","pages":"312 - 328"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edgar Allan Poe Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/edgallpoerev.22.2.0312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Like the Saxon king Alfred the Great, the narrator of "The Tell-Tale Heart" hears "with both his ears." However, whereas Alfred's chronicler, Bishop Asser, describes Alfred's talent for listening as a complement to the king's eager rationality, the narrator of "The Tell-Tale Heart," who also hears "with both his ears," is eager but not rational. He characterizes his acute hearing as a happy byproduct of an unnamed "disease," arguing that it validates his claim of sanity, but his hearing is actually a vehicle for Poe's irony. While drawing on prior criticism, this article stresses how Poe's artistic control throughout the tale undermines the narrator's pretense of self-control. Thus, where the narrator calmly claims that mysterious vibrations from an old man's "Evil Eye" drove him to murder, Poe ironically emphasizes that sound is the character's undoing, ultimately producing a kind of aural nausea that the narrator re-experiences in the present as he tells an unidentified auditor how he murdered the old man. This nausea is what caused him to spew forth his confession of murder for the police originally and what causes him to do so again in the telling of events for his auditor. Poe particularly displays his artistic control with repetitions, rhetorically mocking the narrator's claim that heightened hearing demonstrates his sanity through the text's insistently repeated versions of the word "ear," but he also displays his control through the rhetorical device of deixis, which derides the storyteller's inability to separate the narratorial past from the narratorial present.
“我很熟悉这个声音”:《说心》中的修辞嘲讽
摘要:与撒克逊国王阿尔弗雷德大帝一样,《讲述故事的心》的叙述者“用两只耳朵”听到。然而,阿尔弗雷德的编年史作者阿塞尔主教将阿尔弗雷德的倾听天赋描述为对国王渴望理性的补充,而《讲述故事之心》的讲述者“用两只眼睛”听到,他渴望但不理性。他将自己敏锐的听觉描述为一种未命名的“疾病”的快乐副产品,认为这证实了他理智的说法,但他的听觉实际上是爱伦·坡讽刺的载体。在借鉴之前的批评的同时,本文强调了坡在整个故事中的艺术控制是如何破坏叙述者自我控制的伪装的。因此,叙事者平静地宣称,一位老人“邪恶之眼”的神秘振动驱使他去谋杀,坡讽刺地强调,声音是这个角色的毁灭,最终产生了一种听觉上的恶心,叙事者在告诉一位身份不明的审计员他是如何谋杀老人时,会重新体验到这种恶心。这种恶心是他最初向警方坦白谋杀的原因,也是他在为审计员讲述事件时再次这样做的原因。爱伦·坡特别通过重复来展示他的艺术控制力,他在修辞上嘲笑叙述者的说法,即通过文本中不断重复的“耳朵”一词,提高听力表明了他的理智,但他也通过指示语的修辞手段来展示他的控制力,它嘲笑讲故事的人无法将叙述的过去与叙述的现在分开。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Edgar Allan Poe Review
Edgar Allan Poe Review LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Edgar Allan Poe Review publishes scholarly essays on and creative responses to Edgar Allan Poe, his life, works, and influence and provides a forum for the informal exchange of information on Poe-related events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信