{"title":"Complementizer doubling and subject extraction in Italo-Romance","authors":"N. Munaro","doi":"10.1075/LV.00020.MUN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this article I analyze the complementizer doubling construction attested in some early and modern Italo-Romance\n varieties, where a preposed (clausal or non clausal) constituent associated to the selected clause appears in the embedded left\n periphery preceded and followed by a subordinating complementizer. While the higher complementizer is uncontroversially\n interpreted as a lexicalization of the head Force°, the lower complementizer has been taken to lexicalize either the functional\n head Topic° or the functional head Fin°. Relying on previous formal analyses of subject extraction, I argue that in the varieties\n in which the lower complementizer lexicalizes Fin°, its presence reflects the lexicalization of the mood features encoded by Fin°,\n and is ultimately due to the extraction of the thematic subject out of the embedded clause through Spec,FinP, a movement strategy\n made possible by the presence of an expletive pro in the canonical preverbal subject position.","PeriodicalId":53947,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Variation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Variation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/LV.00020.MUN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this article I analyze the complementizer doubling construction attested in some early and modern Italo-Romance
varieties, where a preposed (clausal or non clausal) constituent associated to the selected clause appears in the embedded left
periphery preceded and followed by a subordinating complementizer. While the higher complementizer is uncontroversially
interpreted as a lexicalization of the head Force°, the lower complementizer has been taken to lexicalize either the functional
head Topic° or the functional head Fin°. Relying on previous formal analyses of subject extraction, I argue that in the varieties
in which the lower complementizer lexicalizes Fin°, its presence reflects the lexicalization of the mood features encoded by Fin°,
and is ultimately due to the extraction of the thematic subject out of the embedded clause through Spec,FinP, a movement strategy
made possible by the presence of an expletive pro in the canonical preverbal subject position.
期刊介绍:
Linguistic Variation is an international, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on the study of linguistic variation. It seeks to investigate to what extent the study of linguistic variation can shed light on the broader issue of language-particular versus language-universal properties, on the interaction between what is fixed and necessary on the one hand and what is variable and contingent on the other. This enterprise involves properly defining and delineating the notion of linguistic variation by identifying loci of variation. What are the variable properties of natural language and what is its invariant core?