Mindfulness and attention: Towards a phenomenology of mindfulness as the feeling of being tuned in

IF 0.5 2区 哲学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Erol Čopelj
{"title":"Mindfulness and attention: Towards a phenomenology of mindfulness as the feeling of being tuned in","authors":"Erol Čopelj","doi":"10.1080/09552367.2022.2031015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT There is a consensus in the contemporary literature that mindfulness is a kind of attention. From here the literature divides into two opposing camps:the ‘Quietists’ and the ‘Cognitivists’. For the Quietists mindfulness is ‘bare attention’: the kind of attention that remains when all higher-order mental activity is suspended. For the Cognitivists, by contrast, mindfulness is a kind of retentive attention that brings into play specific kinds of cognitive processes . Through a critical analysis of the contemporary literature this essay will try to establish that the common assumption is mistaken, and that mindfulness cannot be identified with any kind of attention. It will be argued that we get much closer to the true nature of mindfulness if we conceive of it as an example of what Matthew Ratcliffe has called ‘feeling of being’ . Mindfulness is the feeling of being tuned in to the intrinsic intelligibility of the things themselves.","PeriodicalId":44358,"journal":{"name":"ASIAN PHILOSOPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASIAN PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2022.2031015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT There is a consensus in the contemporary literature that mindfulness is a kind of attention. From here the literature divides into two opposing camps:the ‘Quietists’ and the ‘Cognitivists’. For the Quietists mindfulness is ‘bare attention’: the kind of attention that remains when all higher-order mental activity is suspended. For the Cognitivists, by contrast, mindfulness is a kind of retentive attention that brings into play specific kinds of cognitive processes . Through a critical analysis of the contemporary literature this essay will try to establish that the common assumption is mistaken, and that mindfulness cannot be identified with any kind of attention. It will be argued that we get much closer to the true nature of mindfulness if we conceive of it as an example of what Matthew Ratcliffe has called ‘feeling of being’ . Mindfulness is the feeling of being tuned in to the intrinsic intelligibility of the things themselves.
正念和注意力:正念现象学的研究方向是被调谐的感觉
摘要在当代文学中有一种共识,即正念是一种注意力。从这里开始,文学分为两个对立的阵营:“安静主义者”和“认知主义者”。对于安静主义者来说,正念是“纯粹的注意力”:当所有高阶心理活动暂停时,这种注意力仍然存在。相比之下,对于认知主义者来说,正念是一种保持注意力,它能发挥特定类型的认知过程。通过对当代文学的批判性分析,本文将试图确定普遍的假设是错误的,正念不能与任何形式的注意力相联系。有人会说,如果我们把正念视为马修·拉特克利夫所说的“存在感”的一个例子,我们就会更接近正念的真实本质。正念是一种被调谐到事物本身内在可理解性中的感觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ASIAN PHILOSOPHY
ASIAN PHILOSOPHY Multiple-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Asian Philosophy is an international journal concerned with such philosophical traditions as Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Buddhist and Islamic. The purpose of the journal is to bring these rich and varied traditions to a worldwide academic audience. It publishes articles in the central philosophical areas of metaphysics, philosophy of mind, epistemology, logic, moral and social philosophy, as well as in applied philosophical areas such as aesthetics and jurisprudence. It also publishes articles comparing Eastern and Western philosophical traditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信