Effects of adsorption and filtration processes on greywater microbiological contamination and the potential human health risk reduction

IF 4.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Water Reuse Pub Date : 2023-07-19 DOI:10.2166/wrd.2023.029
M. Mortula, K. Fattah, Fatima Iqbal, Zahid Khan
{"title":"Effects of adsorption and filtration processes on greywater microbiological contamination and the potential human health risk reduction","authors":"M. Mortula, K. Fattah, Fatima Iqbal, Zahid Khan","doi":"10.2166/wrd.2023.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Recycling treated greywater (GW) for onsite, non-potable applications can reduce the potable water demand typically used for non-potable purposes. The conventional methods for GW treatment are limited in their ability to remove wide-ranging pollutants that are inexpensive and use low energy. For this reason, effective and low-cost onsite treatment options are in demand. This study examines the effectiveness of sand filtration (SF), granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS), and activated carbon (AC) in the treatment of GW from a residential apartment building in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. The study relies on four different pilot-scale experimental setups to investigate the effectiveness of SF, AC, and GBFS in treating microorganisms from GW and evaluate the microbial risk reduction using these treatment processes. A quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) approach is used for risk assessment. Results show that GBFS achieves a higher reduction of total coliform (TC) (0.54–2.05 log removal) and fecal coliform (FC) (1.96–2.30 log removal) than AC. SF improves reduction by 0.13–3.39 log removal and 1.11–3.68 log removal for TC and FC, respectively. The study also reveals substantial FC and Escherichia coli risk reduction by SF, AC and GBFS.","PeriodicalId":34727,"journal":{"name":"Water Reuse","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Reuse","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wrd.2023.029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recycling treated greywater (GW) for onsite, non-potable applications can reduce the potable water demand typically used for non-potable purposes. The conventional methods for GW treatment are limited in their ability to remove wide-ranging pollutants that are inexpensive and use low energy. For this reason, effective and low-cost onsite treatment options are in demand. This study examines the effectiveness of sand filtration (SF), granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS), and activated carbon (AC) in the treatment of GW from a residential apartment building in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. The study relies on four different pilot-scale experimental setups to investigate the effectiveness of SF, AC, and GBFS in treating microorganisms from GW and evaluate the microbial risk reduction using these treatment processes. A quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) approach is used for risk assessment. Results show that GBFS achieves a higher reduction of total coliform (TC) (0.54–2.05 log removal) and fecal coliform (FC) (1.96–2.30 log removal) than AC. SF improves reduction by 0.13–3.39 log removal and 1.11–3.68 log removal for TC and FC, respectively. The study also reveals substantial FC and Escherichia coli risk reduction by SF, AC and GBFS.
吸附和过滤工艺对灰水中微生物污染的影响及潜在的人类健康风险降低
将处理过的灰水(GW)回收用于现场非饮用应用可以减少通常用于非饮用目的的饮用水需求。GW处理的传统方法在去除范围广泛的污染物的能力方面受到限制,这些污染物价格低廉且能耗低。因此,需要有效和低成本的现场治疗方案。本研究考察了砂滤(SF)、高炉矿渣颗粒(GBFS)和活性炭(AC)处理阿拉伯联合酋长国沙迦一栋住宅楼GW的有效性。该研究依赖于四个不同的中试规模实验装置,以调查SF、AC和GBFS在处理GW微生物方面的有效性,并评估使用这些处理过程降低微生物风险的情况。定量微生物风险评估(QMRA)方法用于风险评估。结果表明,与AC相比,GBFS对总大肠菌群(TC)(去除0.54–2.05 log)和粪便大肠杆菌群(FC)(去除1.96–2.30 log)的去除率更高。SF对TC和FC的去除率分别提高了0.13–3.39 log和1.11–3.68 log。该研究还揭示了SF、AC和GBFS显著降低FC和大肠杆菌的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Water Reuse
Water Reuse Multiple-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信