The Relationship between the Sexual Double Standard and Women's Sexual Health and Comfort.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
International Journal of Sexual Health Pub Date : 2022-04-26 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1080/19317611.2022.2069179
Michael J Marks, Tara M Busch, Ashley Wu
{"title":"The Relationship between the Sexual Double Standard and Women's Sexual Health and Comfort.","authors":"Michael J Marks, Tara M Busch, Ashley Wu","doi":"10.1080/19317611.2022.2069179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current research explores the relationship between Sexual Double Standard (SDS) endorsement and women's sexual health and attitudes. Women (<i>n</i> = 705) completed an SDS endorsement scale, and then answered a variety of questions in three main categories of outcome variables: sexual comfort, sexual reputation, and sexual health. Results suggest that women's SDS endorsement was not related to women's sexual comfort. Further, SDS endorsement was slightly positively related to how concerned women were about their sexual reputation. Regarding sexual health, SDS endorsement was related to a shorter timespan since women's last OBGYN screening, and unrelated to women's discomfort discussing birth control with their OBGYN. Results suggest there is much more to explore in targeted studies on the relationship of SDS endorsement to women's perceptions of their sexual reputations and their interactions with OBGYNs with respect to the SDS. Previous and related research is discussed, along with implications of the current research.</p>","PeriodicalId":46855,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sexual Health","volume":"34 1","pages":"409-423"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10903628/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sexual Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2022.2069179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current research explores the relationship between Sexual Double Standard (SDS) endorsement and women's sexual health and attitudes. Women (n = 705) completed an SDS endorsement scale, and then answered a variety of questions in three main categories of outcome variables: sexual comfort, sexual reputation, and sexual health. Results suggest that women's SDS endorsement was not related to women's sexual comfort. Further, SDS endorsement was slightly positively related to how concerned women were about their sexual reputation. Regarding sexual health, SDS endorsement was related to a shorter timespan since women's last OBGYN screening, and unrelated to women's discomfort discussing birth control with their OBGYN. Results suggest there is much more to explore in targeted studies on the relationship of SDS endorsement to women's perceptions of their sexual reputations and their interactions with OBGYNs with respect to the SDS. Previous and related research is discussed, along with implications of the current research.

性别双重标准与女性性健康与性舒适的关系
摘要当前的研究探讨了性双重标准(SDS)认可与女性性健康和性态度之间的关系。女性(n = 705)完成了SDS认可量表,然后回答了三类主要结果变量中的各种问题:性舒适、性声誉和性健康。结果表明,女性的SDS支持与女性的性舒适度无关。此外,SDS的支持与女性对自己性声誉的关注程度呈正相关。关于性健康,SDS的支持与女性上一次妇产科筛查后的时间跨度较短有关,与女性在与妇产科医生讨论节育问题时的不适无关。研究结果表明,在有针对性的研究中,关于SDS背书与女性对其性声誉的认知以及与妇产科医生在SDS方面的互动之间的关系,还有很多需要探索的地方。讨论了以往和相关的研究,以及当前研究的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health, the International Journal of Sexual Health promotes sexual health as a state of physical, emotional, mental, and social well-being through a positive approach to sexuality and sexual rights. The journal publishes peer-reviewed scientific papers, editorials, and reviews, using quantitative and qualitative methods, descriptive and critical analysis, instrument development, surveys, and case studies to examine the essential elements of this broad concept. Leading experts from around the world present original work that covers a variety of disciplines, including sexology, biology, medicine, psychology, sociology, anthropology, history, and religion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信