COVID-19 stigma, Australia and slow violence: An analysis of 21 months of COVID news reporting

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES
Nichole Georgeou, Cymbeline Buhler King, Lilian Tame, Christina Ergler, Robert Huish
{"title":"COVID-19 stigma, Australia and slow violence: An analysis of 21 months of COVID news reporting","authors":"Nichole Georgeou,&nbsp;Cymbeline Buhler King,&nbsp;Lilian Tame,&nbsp;Christina Ergler,&nbsp;Robert Huish","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Throughout the peak periods of Australia's COVID-19 pandemic experience of 2020–2021, some lower socioeconomic areas with high migrant populations in Sydney and Melbourne were subjected to strict lockdown enforcement that included heavy police surveillance not experienced in the more affluent areas of these cities. Analysis of four major newspapers' COVID-19 coverage from January 2020 to September 2021 reveals their reporting focussed on aspects of individual behaviour that inferred people from lower socioeconomic areas had a heightened risk of exposure to COVID-19. We argue this media portrayal of severe lockdowns and policing measures played a prominent role in exacerbating previously existing stigma as it compounded the stigma levelled at those communities. It further contributed to an “us and them” mentality that aligned with persistent structural inequality to compound existing stigma to develop a slow violence of COVID-19-related stigma. The lens of slow violence allows us to track incremental stigmatising processes, often imperceptible when viewed in isolation. Axiomatic violence adds a complementary perspective to slow violence, highlighting the role of crisis and disciplinary behaviours in embedding structural violence into the social norms of daily life.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"58 4","pages":"787-804"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.273","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajs4.273","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Throughout the peak periods of Australia's COVID-19 pandemic experience of 2020–2021, some lower socioeconomic areas with high migrant populations in Sydney and Melbourne were subjected to strict lockdown enforcement that included heavy police surveillance not experienced in the more affluent areas of these cities. Analysis of four major newspapers' COVID-19 coverage from January 2020 to September 2021 reveals their reporting focussed on aspects of individual behaviour that inferred people from lower socioeconomic areas had a heightened risk of exposure to COVID-19. We argue this media portrayal of severe lockdowns and policing measures played a prominent role in exacerbating previously existing stigma as it compounded the stigma levelled at those communities. It further contributed to an “us and them” mentality that aligned with persistent structural inequality to compound existing stigma to develop a slow violence of COVID-19-related stigma. The lens of slow violence allows us to track incremental stigmatising processes, often imperceptible when viewed in isolation. Axiomatic violence adds a complementary perspective to slow violence, highlighting the role of crisis and disciplinary behaviours in embedding structural violence into the social norms of daily life.

Abstract Image

COVID - 19污名、澳大利亚和缓慢暴力:对21个月COVID新闻报道的分析
在2020-2021年澳大利亚2019冠状病毒病大流行的高峰期,悉尼和墨尔本一些社会经济水平较低、移民人口较多的地区受到了严格的封锁执法,其中包括在这些城市较富裕的地区没有经历过的严密警察监视。对2020年1月至2021年9月四家主要报纸COVID-19报道的分析显示,它们的报道侧重于个人行为方面,推断来自社会经济地位较低地区的人接触COVID-19的风险更高。我们认为,媒体对严重封锁和警务措施的描述在加剧先前存在的污名方面发挥了突出作用,因为它加剧了这些社区的污名。它进一步助长了“我们和他们”的心态,这种心态与持续存在的结构性不平等相一致,加剧了现有的耻辱,形成了与covid -19相关的耻辱的缓慢暴力。缓慢暴力的镜头使我们能够跟踪逐渐增加的污名化过程,如果孤立地看待,往往难以察觉。公理暴力为缓慢暴力提供了一个补充视角,突出了危机和纪律行为在将结构性暴力嵌入日常生活社会规范方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信