Politics of Psychoanalytic Knowledge: Canguilhem’s Reading of Freud

IF 0.1 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Annagiulia Canesso
{"title":"Politics of Psychoanalytic Knowledge: Canguilhem’s Reading of Freud","authors":"Annagiulia Canesso","doi":"10.6092/ISSN.1825-9618/13782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Georges Canguilhem has never systematically discussed Sigmund Freud’s thinking. This essay aims to reconstruct Canguilhem’s reading of Freudian psychoanalysis, highlighting its strategic use within the framework of Canguilhem’s controversy against psychology. From this point of view, knowledge is established as a field of political struggle: unlike psychology and its deterministic and normalizing drifts, psychoanalysis allows Canguilhem to affirm the irreducibility of thought to brain localizations, to emphasize its erratic power and to think the constitution of an eccentric subjectivity.","PeriodicalId":41532,"journal":{"name":"Scienza & Politica-Per una Storia delle Dottrine","volume":"33 1","pages":"91-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scienza & Politica-Per una Storia delle Dottrine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.1825-9618/13782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Georges Canguilhem has never systematically discussed Sigmund Freud’s thinking. This essay aims to reconstruct Canguilhem’s reading of Freudian psychoanalysis, highlighting its strategic use within the framework of Canguilhem’s controversy against psychology. From this point of view, knowledge is established as a field of political struggle: unlike psychology and its deterministic and normalizing drifts, psychoanalysis allows Canguilhem to affirm the irreducibility of thought to brain localizations, to emphasize its erratic power and to think the constitution of an eccentric subjectivity.
精神分析知识的政治学:坎吉勒姆对弗洛伊德的解读
乔治·冈居朗从未系统地讨论过西格蒙德·弗洛伊德的思想。本文旨在重构冈居朗对弗洛伊德精神分析学的解读,强调其在冈居朗反对心理学的争论框架内的策略运用。从这个角度来看,知识被确立为政治斗争的领域:与心理学及其确定性和正常化的漂移不同,精神分析使冈居朗能够肯定思想对大脑定位的不可约性,强调其飘忽不定的力量,并思考一个古怪主体性的构成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信