{"title":"Heidegger’s Concept of Authenticity and the Aristotelian σπουδαῖος","authors":"Ioanna Patsioti-Tsacpounidis","doi":"10.1163/18725473-bja10031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn this paper, we try to establish a connection between Heidegger’s conception of authenticity and the Aristotelian σπουδαῖος. Through an exploration of Heidegger’s reference to authenticity, Aristotle’s concept of σπουδαῖος, and a reinterpretation of Heidegger’s reappropriation of certain Aristotelian concepts, such as αἴσθησις, πίστις and προαίρεσις, we wish to show that the authentic Dasein has assumed full responsibility of its role in life, and it has developed ontologically, in the same way a σπουδαῖος man acknowledges one’s full potentiality in purposeful action. The σπουδαῖος as the authentic Dasein grasps the moment, gives rise to the occasion by directing one’s judgement towards the praxis, and comes to provide its own stance in the facticity of life. In fact, the σπουδαῖος, like an authentic Dasein, in a way, comes to reflect the synthesis between θεωρία and πράξις as well as an implicit effort for Dasein to uncover itself to the world and to allow the world to uncover to it.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18725473-bja10031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this paper, we try to establish a connection between Heidegger’s conception of authenticity and the Aristotelian σπουδαῖος. Through an exploration of Heidegger’s reference to authenticity, Aristotle’s concept of σπουδαῖος, and a reinterpretation of Heidegger’s reappropriation of certain Aristotelian concepts, such as αἴσθησις, πίστις and προαίρεσις, we wish to show that the authentic Dasein has assumed full responsibility of its role in life, and it has developed ontologically, in the same way a σπουδαῖος man acknowledges one’s full potentiality in purposeful action. The σπουδαῖος as the authentic Dasein grasps the moment, gives rise to the occasion by directing one’s judgement towards the praxis, and comes to provide its own stance in the facticity of life. In fact, the σπουδαῖος, like an authentic Dasein, in a way, comes to reflect the synthesis between θεωρία and πράξις as well as an implicit effort for Dasein to uncover itself to the world and to allow the world to uncover to it.
在本文中,我们试图建立海德格尔的真实性概念与亚里士多德的σπο ο δα ος之间的联系。通过对海德格尔对本真的提及、亚里士多德的σπο ο δα ο ος概念的探索,以及对海德格尔对某些亚里士多德概念(如α ι σθησις、π σις和προα σις)的重新诠释,我们希望表明,真实的此在已经承担了它在生活中角色的全部责任,并且它已经在本体论上发展,就像一个σπο ο δα ο ος人在有目的的行动中承认自己的全部潜力一样。σπο ο ν δα ος作为真正的此在(Dasein),抓住了时机,通过把判断导向实践而引起了这种场合,并在生活的现实性中提出了自己的立场。事实上,σπο ο ος就像一个真正的Dasein,在某种程度上反映了θεωρ α和πρ ξις之间的综合,也是Dasein向世界揭示自身,也让世界向它揭示自身的含蓄努力。