Bridging the Gap Between Research and Practice of Engagement: Toward a Collaborative Human Resource Development

IF 3.1 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Bo Fang
{"title":"Bridging the Gap Between Research and Practice of Engagement: Toward a Collaborative Human Resource Development","authors":"Bo Fang","doi":"10.1177/15234223231156627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Problem As the discourse around employee engagement has continued to emerge as an interdisciplinary, intercultural, and interprofessional concept, the gap between research and practice of engagement still remains, making collaboration among HRD scholars and practitioners in developing an engaged workforce a huge challenge. The Solution To fill the gap between research and practice on engagement, ontological, epistemological, and focal views of various perspectives on engagement are reviewed. Conceptual commonalities and differences in the multiple definitions, theories, and frameworks of employee engagement are also discussed. By exploring the divergence and convergence in the engagement discourse, a common ground for collaborative HRD in developing an engaged workforce is identified. Finally, implications for HRD research and practice are provided. The Stakeholders The intended audience for this article is HRD scholars, practitioners, and employers interested in developing an engaged workforce and workplace.","PeriodicalId":51549,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Developing Human Resources","volume":"25 1","pages":"95 - 115"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Developing Human Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15234223231156627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Problem As the discourse around employee engagement has continued to emerge as an interdisciplinary, intercultural, and interprofessional concept, the gap between research and practice of engagement still remains, making collaboration among HRD scholars and practitioners in developing an engaged workforce a huge challenge. The Solution To fill the gap between research and practice on engagement, ontological, epistemological, and focal views of various perspectives on engagement are reviewed. Conceptual commonalities and differences in the multiple definitions, theories, and frameworks of employee engagement are also discussed. By exploring the divergence and convergence in the engagement discourse, a common ground for collaborative HRD in developing an engaged workforce is identified. Finally, implications for HRD research and practice are provided. The Stakeholders The intended audience for this article is HRD scholars, practitioners, and employers interested in developing an engaged workforce and workplace.
弥合敬业研究与实践之间的差距:迈向协作式人力资源开发
问题随着围绕员工敬业度的讨论继续成为一个跨学科、跨文化和跨专业的概念,敬业度的研究和实践之间的差距仍然存在,这使得人力资源开发学者和从业者之间的合作在培养敬业的员工队伍方面成为一个巨大的挑战。综述了填补参与研究与实践之间差距的解决方案、本体论、认识论以及各种参与视角的焦点观点。还讨论了员工敬业度的多种定义、理论和框架的概念共性和差异。通过探索参与话语中的分歧和趋同,确定了合作人力资源开发在培养参与劳动力方面的共同点。最后,对人力资源开发的研究和实践提供了启示。利益相关者本文的目标受众是对培养敬业的劳动力和工作场所感兴趣的人力资源开发学者、从业者和雇主。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Developing Human Resources
Advances in Developing Human Resources INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Advances in Developing Human Resources is a bi-monthly journal whose single issues explore and examine discrete topics. These single issues (or "back issues," once the subsequent issue is published) are available individually or in quantities for use in a classroom or training environment. Balancing practice, theory, and readability, each issue is devoted to important and timely topics related to the development of human resources. The content of the journal spans the realms of performance, learning, and integrity within an organizational context. Readable and relevant to practitioners, each issue is grounded in sound research and theory and edited by a top scholar in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信