Systematic literature review of legal design: Concepts, processes, and methods

IF 0.8 4区 艺术学 0 ART
Sunghoon Chung, Jieun Kim
{"title":"Systematic literature review of legal design: Concepts, processes, and methods","authors":"Sunghoon Chung, Jieun Kim","doi":"10.1080/14606925.2022.2144549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The emergence of legal design has recently raised considerable interest from both design and legal communities. The present study is based on a systematic review of the legal design in peer-reviewed publications from 2001 to 2021, to identify current knowledge of its concepts, processes, and methods in the literature. Our analysis found that legal design and design thinking are conceptually comparable as both possess a human-centred approach to innovation. However, due to the inherent nature of law and the legal system, legal design and design thinking processes and methods differ in practice. Notably, proactiveness and stakeholder-centred thinking are key concepts of legal design. Legal design emphasises interdisciplinary and collaborative approaches to accommodate diverse stakeholders with competing priorities and to improve communication. Finally, drawing on the literature review, we conclude by reflecting on our analysis and raising further research questions for design practitioners and researchers.","PeriodicalId":46826,"journal":{"name":"Design Journal","volume":"26 1","pages":"399 - 416"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2022.2144549","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The emergence of legal design has recently raised considerable interest from both design and legal communities. The present study is based on a systematic review of the legal design in peer-reviewed publications from 2001 to 2021, to identify current knowledge of its concepts, processes, and methods in the literature. Our analysis found that legal design and design thinking are conceptually comparable as both possess a human-centred approach to innovation. However, due to the inherent nature of law and the legal system, legal design and design thinking processes and methods differ in practice. Notably, proactiveness and stakeholder-centred thinking are key concepts of legal design. Legal design emphasises interdisciplinary and collaborative approaches to accommodate diverse stakeholders with competing priorities and to improve communication. Finally, drawing on the literature review, we conclude by reflecting on our analysis and raising further research questions for design practitioners and researchers.
法律设计的系统文献回顾:概念、过程和方法
摘要法律设计的出现最近引起了设计界和法律界的极大兴趣。本研究基于对2001年至2021年同行评审出版物中法律设计的系统回顾,以确定文献中对其概念、过程和方法的现有知识。我们的分析发现,法律设计和设计思维在概念上具有可比性,因为两者都具有以人为中心的创新方法。然而,由于法律和法律制度的固有性质,法律设计和设计的思维过程和方法在实践中有所不同。值得注意的是,积极性和以利益相关者为中心的思维是法律设计的关键概念。法律设计强调跨学科和协作方法,以适应具有竞争优先事项的不同利益相关者,并改善沟通。最后,在文献综述的基础上,我们对我们的分析进行了反思,并为设计从业者和研究人员提出了进一步的研究问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
68
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信