Trees and Trash: Examining the Link Between Urban Forest Engagement and Blight in Atlanta, Georgia, United States

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
C. Gaither, E. Kuehler, W. Zipperer, E. Aka, B. Barger
{"title":"Trees and Trash: Examining the Link Between Urban Forest Engagement and Blight in Atlanta, Georgia, United States","authors":"C. Gaither, E. Kuehler, W. Zipperer, E. Aka, B. Barger","doi":"10.22459/her.25.02.2019.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research conducted in various contexts suggests that urban greenspace, primarily trees, helps to reduce crime rates and other negative aspects of place. This study contributes to that literature by examining residents’ reporting of activities they do to create, maintain, and protect the urban forest in Atlanta, Georgia (USA), and the association of this involvement with blight measures. Using binary logistic regression, we found that urban forest engagement did not mediate egregious blight conditions but did reduce the presence of litter. Rather, residence in predominantly African American communities was the most consistent predictor of more substantial indicators of blight. Except for litter, these are overwhelming conditions, often involving absentee property owners. Redress requires municipal-level, bureaucratic 1 Corresponding author: cassandra.johnson@usda.gov Human Ecology Review, Volume 25, Number 2, 2019 92 interventions, which can be complex. Urban forest engagement appears relatively ineffectual in combating the worst kinds of blight but may aid in reducing more pedestrian forms.","PeriodicalId":46896,"journal":{"name":"Human Ecology Review","volume":"25 1","pages":"91-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Ecology Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/her.25.02.2019.07","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research conducted in various contexts suggests that urban greenspace, primarily trees, helps to reduce crime rates and other negative aspects of place. This study contributes to that literature by examining residents’ reporting of activities they do to create, maintain, and protect the urban forest in Atlanta, Georgia (USA), and the association of this involvement with blight measures. Using binary logistic regression, we found that urban forest engagement did not mediate egregious blight conditions but did reduce the presence of litter. Rather, residence in predominantly African American communities was the most consistent predictor of more substantial indicators of blight. Except for litter, these are overwhelming conditions, often involving absentee property owners. Redress requires municipal-level, bureaucratic 1 Corresponding author: cassandra.johnson@usda.gov Human Ecology Review, Volume 25, Number 2, 2019 92 interventions, which can be complex. Urban forest engagement appears relatively ineffectual in combating the worst kinds of blight but may aid in reducing more pedestrian forms.
树木与垃圾:检视美国乔治亚州亚特兰大市城市森林参与与枯萎病之间的联系
在各种背景下进行的研究表明,城市绿地,主要是树木,有助于降低犯罪率和其他负面因素。这项研究通过调查美国乔治亚州亚特兰大市居民为创建、维护和保护城市森林所做活动的报告,以及这种参与与枯萎病措施的关系,为该文献做出了贡献。使用二元逻辑回归,我们发现城市森林参与并没有介导严重的枯萎病条件,但确实减少了垃圾的存在。相反,居住在以非裔美国人为主的社区是更实质性枯萎病指标的最一致预测因素。除了垃圾,这些都是压倒性的条件,经常涉及缺席的业主。补救措施需要市级、官僚机构1通讯作者:cassandra.johnson@usda.gov《人类生态学评论》,第25卷,2019年第2期,92项干预措施,可能很复杂。城市森林参与在对抗最严重的枯萎病方面似乎相对无效,但可能有助于减少更多的步行形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Human Ecology Review (ISSN 1074-4827) is a refereed journal published twice a year by the Society for Human Ecology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed research and theory on the interaction between humans and the environment and other links between culture and nature (Research in Human Ecology), essays and applications relevant to human ecology (Human Ecology Forum), book reviews (Contemporary Human Ecology), and relevant commentary, announcements, and awards (Human Ecology Bulletin).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信